Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

valdore

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Jan 9, 2007
1,262
0
Kansas City, Missouri. USA
Am I correct in the assumption that using a Firewire cable to upload my photos from the camera to the computer will be a lot faster than using the USB cord that came with the camera?

I ask because uploading RAW files from a 5D takes a tortuous amount of time using USB.

How many pins on each end of the cable do I need for the cable to work between the camera and the computer?
 

yippy

macrumors 68020
Mar 14, 2004
2,087
3
Chicago, IL
The camera needs to have firewire first......

If you are uploading using the camera that is part of your problem. Get a good external USB card reader and watch your times be cut in half.

PS, the whole Firewire thing for cameras if for video, not stills. I don't know any DSLR that have Firewire but almost all camcorders do.
 

ups757pf

macrumors newbie
Apr 24, 2007
17
0
SanDisk has a firewire CF card reader that works on both FW800 and FW400. Its way faster than USB.
 

Digital Skunk

macrumors G3
Dec 23, 2006
8,100
930
In my imagination
USB 2.0 is wonderful for small files... anything smaller than 512MB IMHO.

FW400 and 800 are perfect for everything else. Get the card readers that have Firewire on them and never look back.
 

Hmac

macrumors 68020
May 30, 2007
2,134
4
Midwest USA
The 5D doesn't have a Firewire connector, so you can't connect the camera, but you can get an external firewire card reader and that is indeed going to be much faster. Get on that support Firewire 800.
 

jlcharles

macrumors 6502
Mar 30, 2006
345
0
Wenonah, NJ
While USB has a higher theoretical speed of 420 or something, firewire 400 has a much higher sustained speed. I've firewire networked my laptop and imac and transferred upwards of 10 gigs of photos in 5-10 minutes. I want to get a firewire reader for my cards as I use a cheap USB one now.
 

Crawn2003

macrumors 6502
Jul 8, 2005
444
0
Santa Rosa, California
I have a Fuji S5 and I take anywhere between 2-4 gigs of photos at a time with it.

I bought a USB Card Reader and a Firewire Card Reader and to transfer 3 or 4 gigs it would have taken the USB about 20+ minutes. The Firewire reader actually transfered it in around 7 minutes.

~Crawn
 

dllavaneras

macrumors 68000
Feb 12, 2005
1,948
2
Caracas, Venezuela
I don't know any DSLR that have Firewire.

Every Canon in the 1D series has firewire (except maybe the original 1D). The Fujifilm FinePix S3 Pro also has firewire.

And I agree with the other posters, get a FW card reader. That way you can spend more time taking pics instead of transferring them to your computer. ;)
 

jwkicks

macrumors newbie
Jun 19, 2007
27
0
USB can be painfully slow and dont use the USB on your camera, use a card reader. There a few FW800 ones out there now I think.
 

ab2650

macrumors 6502a
Jun 21, 2007
714
0
I don't know any DSLR that have Firewire...
My Nikon D1x was Firewire. It was still painfully slow anyway so I used a card reader and it was much better.

To the OP; Downloading pictures with your camera "tethered" to the computer will also use your camera's battery. If you're really serious about upping transfer time, look at a FW800 card reader.
 

Kebabselector

macrumors 68030
May 25, 2007
2,990
1,641
Birmingham, UK
DPReview states the opposite, that's where I checked to make the above post. But, having never actually seen either one, it could be a typo. :)

Think Dpreview have got it wrong. I've seen the Eos 1d MkIII and it was missing off that one (it was a preproduction one though). The Canon website only lists the 2 new Eos 1D's as having USB 2.0
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.