Sarcastic & correctly spoken!breaking news, computer with 60% less pixels to render wins benchmark tests.
Size? More like resolution.Your screen needs to be the same size
breaking news, computer with 60% less pixels to render wins benchmark tests.
The card still has to render 60% more pixels, it doesn't just leave them empty. It's not comparing a 1080p 15" screen to a 1080p 27" screen. It's just not apples for apples and not a fair comparison.
Why would the #pixels matter for the second and third tests, which are run at fixed resolution on all devices?
No, it scales the content to the size of the screen. The resolution is the same, so the same number of pixels are being pushed by each card, so it is an exact apple to apple comparison.The card still has to render 60% more pixels, it doesn't just leave them empty. It's not comparing a 1080p 15" screen to a 1080p 27" screen. It's just not apples for apples and not a fair comparison.
The i7 have hyperthreading but a lot lower clock speeds, in this case I don't think that would add up to that big difference. Also there is so much yt videos showing in most cases hyperthreading or more ram after 8GB don't make too noticeable differences.Also i5 to i7
Yes, would i5 v 7 make a difference?Also i5 to i7
Whoops...should probably read to the end before I post....The i7 have hyperthreading but a lot lower clock speeds, in this case I don't think that would add up to that big difference. Also there is so much yt videos showing in most cases hyperthreading or more ram after 8GB don't make too noticeable differences.
Actually, comments in this thread tell me that people who are buying Apple computers know zero about computers at all, and what they do.
Yeah, Radeon Pro 560 is slower in the same resolution in the same Game, than last years Macbook Pro because of Fusion Drive, or 8 vs 16 GB of RAM.
I have never laughed so much in my life. Thank you guys.
The tests are not GPU bound, but CPU bound. Why would you test RP 560 and 460 if you have two different CPUs, which one of them is having much lower throughput. Its even funnier when you will look at comparison with iMac with i5 and AMD Radeon M390. The same framerate, and both GPUs have the same or similar 1024/1280 GCN cores, in core count. Core i5 in 2017 even in 1080p is 90% of the time at 95% load on all cores. Whereas when you will look at Core i7 it still has room. Ryzen CPUs, their reviews and analysis have opened up minds people about this.
Its not Radeon Pro which is slower. It is the CPU that is not able to push enough data to GPU, to feed it.
These screens particular resolution doesn't matter when the benchmarks are made at fixed resolution, like duh...