Get the cheaper camera with a better lens. If this is your first, anyone here will tell you that it's the glass, not the body that's important.I have been looking at both and I am puzzled. I thought I was sold on the 40d but, I read reviews saying that I should buy the cheaper xsi and get a better lens rather than getting the 40d with the 28-135 kit lens.Help!!
Two months ago, I was asking myself the same question. I was ready for something more than my Powershot G9, and since I'm a Canon fanboy (and of course an fanboy too) I immediately started to look at the XSi and the 40D. The things that sold me on the 40D were (not in any particular order):
- I was worried that the XSi would be "too close" to my G9.
- Better kit lens: The 28-135 is great for my needs now--no complaints about it. In the future, though, I plan on getting better glass: a 70-200 f4L (IS or not?) and a nice prime.
- I'm going to be getting my feet wet in sports photograhy (non-commercial) so the extra fps helps.
- I plan on keeping it for at least 4 years, so the metal body and weather sealed battery and CF card doors are a plus.
- faster AF--it focuses very quickly, and with the USM motor in the kit lens, it's also very quiet.
- Bigger viewfinder--I wear glasses, so the extra brightness and magnification is great.
- I liked the more substantial/heavier feel of the 40D.
- I don't know how I would live without the secondary LCD screen on the top and the scroll wheel on the back.
- I was able to get a really good price on it ($1,129) online at B&H, a great photography store based out of NYC.
Don't get me wrong--the XSi is a great camera. I tried both of them out at a local camera store, and I can say that the XSi has a quieter shutter sound, smaller (for those who like a smaller camera) and it's sensor is 12MP instead of the 40D's 10MP. For the circumstances I was in, it just made more sense to go with the 40D for a little bit more money. And I'm glad I did. I LOVE it.
If you have any additional questions, feel free to ask.
-JDR
[*]I was worried that the XSi would be "too close" to my G9.
Same here, I got the 40D for now, and passed on the XSi. For a serious photographer, the 40D is more in line.
Don't worry. The G9 and any SLR are not "close". With the SLR you get zero shutter lag and a much larger sensor. And of course the SLR allows you the change the lens.
THe way to think about it is that to get the best result for the money, after you get the first lenses you need you should have spent more on the lenses then the body. So look at your total first year budget and spend no more than half of it on the body.
The thing is that bodies don't last all that long. Technology moves quickly. But lenses use a mature technology that moves slow. A good lens will have a long lifetime. 20 years is not unreasonable. But buying a body is like buying a computer. Even if it does not break, no one wants a 10 year old computer or DSLR body.
One more argument. No one but you will know which body you shot an image with. You just can't see it when you look at a picture but they can see the effect of the lens.
This is what I have come up with
Sigma Zoom Telephoto 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG Macro Autofocus Lens + EX
Price: $94.95
Where'd you get that price for the Sigma? Seems surprisingly low.
EDIT: Okay, now I see -- you should think about getting the APO version of that lens, it's sharper. I have an older version (of the APO) and like it very much -- a great bargain at $140.
APO version? do you mind explaining that
I would get whatever I can afford. The 40D is a great camera but if you have money, I would recommend getting the 5D kit.
This is what I have come up with
Canon Deluxe Photo Backpack 200EG for Canon EOS SLR Cameras (Black
Price: $38.56
Sigma Zoom Telephoto 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG Macro Autofocus Lens + EX
Price: $94.95
Product Image
Canon BG-E5 Battery Grip for EOS Rebel XS XSi + Advanced DB ROTH Accessory Kit
Price: $155.99
Canon Digital Rebel XSi 12MP Digital SLR Camera with EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Lens (Black)
by Canon\ - $709.97