Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

hsiunghsiung

macrumors member
Original poster
Dec 27, 2020
36
17
I just received my APM, and here are my first impressions after trying out the H95s (I've only owned for a week since theres a 30 day return period) and comparing them
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quick cost comparison how I would go about it:

Apple:
-Airpods max ($549 without tax at bhphoto with payboo card)
-applecare for 2 years ($59, though there are extra fees like $29 if you actually replace them with warranty or something during that period). I'd definitely get this in case condensation issue has long term problems or if the battery dies fast due to so much charging
-waterfield case (99+tax) -> You can go for cheaper options too
-silicon covers (around $10 on amazon)
-apple lightning to 3.5mm audio cable ($35 + tax)
Total: roughly $761

B&O:
-H95 ($800, and no tax needed) -> Currently comes with an extra soft case that can possibly be sold to recoup some $$.
-case ($20 on amazon) if I decide not to use the expensive case that came with the H95 since it might be prone to scratches and be heavy to carry.
-already comes with usbc and 3.5mm cable, along with 3 years warranty (not sure if just limited warranty or includes some accidental)
Total: roughly $820
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Day 1 Impression from APM while connected to iMac for gaming/tidal/youtube/Vox player with flac songs:

Pros:
1) Definitely sounds more full compared to the H95s. I think it's because of the bass that it sounds more full, but at the same time, it doesn't really sound muddy. I think it is tuned to be more fun sounding in the sense that you do feel more immersed into the music (compared to the h95 which might sound thin at times in comparison).
2) I've only worn them for over an hour, but for that 1hr+ straight, it hasn't given me any discomfort (I have a small head and wear glasses), and there were no signs of condensation. I know I definitely need to wear for 2-3 hours+ to be more accurate with understanding the comfort level, but so far it's nice. I have worn it longer overall, but not straight since much of it was 10-30 min at a time.
3) I like the build quality, but the clacking of the ear cups can be a true issue. I may get silicon covers for them
4) The smart case(?) that comes with the headphones is horrible, but you can definitely get third party cases on amazon or the $99 waterfield case which ppl seem to like.
5) Transparency mode is amazing like others have said
6) Noise cancelling is much better than what I've experienced before, coming from QC15, 20, 25. It definitely exceeded my expectations.
7) Can allow for higher volume without distortion compared to the h95
8) BT distance is farther than the h95. I'm not sure by how much, but when I head to a room with the doors closed, I stay connected with APM, while the h95 have audio cut in and out which im assuming is near the threshold for them.

Cons:
1) No power off button (I like the secure feeling of knowing my device is not just draining power constantly and has juice for the next time I use it)
2) not compact, so probably going to be mainly used at home (airpods v1 and pro are way nicer for taking out of the house)
3) Placement of the digital crown and toggle for transparency/anc is not the best as the way I put on headphones usually has my fingers in those spots and accidentally pressing them
4) Possible condensation issue after some time (since my 1 hour+ did make it feel damp in the earcups)

Observation:
1) battery drains like 2-3% outside of case in like 8 hours (overnight) of no use which I don't think is that bad at the moment, but who knows.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Week 1 Impression from H95 while connected to iMac for gaming/tidal/youtube/Vox player with flac songs:

Pros:
1) good build quality minus dial wheels(feels hollow when turning)
2) can be compact/portable when you fold them
3) instruments sound more piercing, so it sounds brighter and more sparkly which is nice at times. Does sound a little bit more electric-y though. Like if someone dialed a little bit of a high pass filter with it. Haven't had sibilance issues despite that.
4) I can wear it for at least 3 hours straight without removing it, and I’m also wearing glasses the whole time. Does feel warm, but not too uncomfortable. I have a small head and ears
5) Audio sounds very clear (might have to do with the more piercing sound signature)

Cons:
1) I might prefer a button to toggle anc and transparency instead of a dial (since its annoying to keep scrolling back and forth to get the max of either end). The dials are fly by wire too, meaning you can turn them indefinitely since they just send electrical signal. You can only tell when you hit the max end of ANC or transparency mode when you hear the audio signal it plays.
2) volume in Bluetooth is not as loud as I wish it was ( I usually go about 90% to enjoy music while I'd prefer to stay around 60-70% on other headphones usually, but I know this is a BT headphone so it's kind of understandable)
3) faint scratching/whirring noise in maxed transparency mode with no music playing. Recently found out at least one other owner experience it too
4) transparency mode allows me to hear outside, but I wish it was more transparent as it’s still hard to hear things around me when music is playing.
5) noise cancelling is decent. Nothing special

Observation:
1) occasionally it stops playing music/sound without me doing anything (not sure why this happens). Turns out theres an auto turn off within 15 min that i had to untoggle in app that might have been what's causing it.
2) I think adaptive anc is only adjustable through app (separate setting from anc and transparency levels)? Not sure if there is on the fly way to toggle it with just headphone. Also not sure if adaptive anc is working as I don’t hear any difference in noise cancelling with it on or off.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Conclusion:

I'm still not sure which I prefer yet. I'm no audiophile, but overall I think I like the sound of the APMs more because of the fuller sound while maintaining clarity, while the H95s have great clarity, but less of the bass feeling at times. I really like the compactness of the h95, the battery life, the power button, and the dial for volume. On the other hand with the APMs, I really like the fun sound, simple look, digital crown, and transparency/anc modes.

When it comes to BT headphones, I don't think audio quality is going to be as important since wired headphones are probably much better for true audiophile experience. I just take BT headphones for convenience at home so I don't have to keep making sure I don't trip over cables or be able to walk to the kitchen or bathroom quickly without having to take off the headphones. There are definitely much cheaper options, but for the best audio experience while still being a BT headphone, these two are hard to decide between due to audio quality and functionality.

Songs on youtube that I used for testing besides for gaming, tidal songs, and the flac files played on VOX:
Piano and beats:
Before the Dawn (brian tong used it for his comparison, and the h95s had wider soundstage than the APM there)

Testing notes:
It's convenient to A/B test them since once you put the Airpods max on, my imac switches to them, and then when I take them off and put the H95s on, my imac plays from the h95s since the airpod max has that sensor that lets it know it's on the head. In that sense, I just have to take off one and put on the other headphone and hit the play button. Except for Vox which requires manually switching the input source.

UPDATE (DAY 2):

1) Wore the APM for 2-3 hours straight while playing AC:Odyssey, and even though my ears were warm after, there were no signs of condensation, and my head did not feel bad discomfort. I was surprised since I expected condensation to be there. It did start to feel warm over my ears to the point where I could prob only last one more hour, but I think that's expected for over ear headphones after wearing for so long without taking them off. I'll try this out for a few days to see if it's consistent. I was indoors at night with my house probably around 67 degrees F (not too warm), so maybe because of that, my body and the APMs didn't get as hot as other use cases that people have.
2) The weight of the APMs are still manageable over my small head with glasses on, but if I move my head too quickly or if I lie down to watch something in bed from my phone, the headphones can shift either backwards if lying down, or just with the movement of the head because of the weight. Not an issue for me since my head is usually stationary, and to shift the headphones require bigger and faster movements that I usually don't do.
3) [NEED TO TEST]: So this time I left my APMs in my focal elegia case overnight, and it drained from 62% to 56% within 7 hours. In comparison, the night before, I noticed a 2-3% drain in 8 hours or so when it was just hanging on my headphone stand. My guess for now is that maybe the sensor that checks if the headphone is on the head goes into different power states when in a case (not smart case) vs hanging on a stand. Maybe it goes to a lower power consumption mode when it's on the headphone stand since it can tell it's not on the ears? And then when it's in the case (closed), it thinks it's on the ears somehow, and stays in just a standby mode that still draws more power? Not sure, but I'll try things out for a few days
4) Cannot use APM in wired mode with just the lightning to USB A cable attached to a mac. You'll have to just be connected by bluetooth while charging only with lightning cable. H95 has dac internally I think, so you can use just the USB C cable attached to mac while bluetooth is off. When bluetooth is on, my output sources show two H95 devices (one with bluetooth icon)
5) [Stretch test] I tried Vmoda Speakeasy lightning to 3.5mm dac cable which didnt work (since they are prob meant to just go in the lightning to 3.5mm direction. I think the apple 3.5mm to lightning direction cable has adac on the 3.5mm to convert analog to digital which is why it works for APM). I guessed it wouldn't work because of the direction intended, but I was just hoping I could be wrong, and since I already had the vmoda cable, why not try it out.
 
Last edited:

Cashmonee

macrumors 65832
May 27, 2006
1,504
1,245
Nice comparison. Interesting to see the real price of the APM creep up so much once you include a decent warranty and case. Have you tried the EQ on the B&O to see if you can get the sound to be more to your liking? Both are heavy headphones, are you seeing that one is more comfortable than the other?
 

Robbosan

Suspended
Aug 21, 2020
2,071
1,837
The real price lol. 2 years here is a descent warranty, for $79aud optional AC plus covers user accidents, a case if you need it can be had for $20 or less.
Stop peddling your BS.
 
  • Like
  • Angry
Reactions: DaPhox and dandrewk

hsiunghsiung

macrumors member
Original poster
Dec 27, 2020
36
17
yeah. amazon def has cases around the $20-$30 mark (just not a fan of some of smell/odor that some of them give off), and you can prob forgo the extra silicon protectors and 3.5mm cable if you dont need them. I'd say minimum get the $549 airpod max and $59 applecare
 

Cashmonee

macrumors 65832
May 27, 2006
1,504
1,245
Any updates? I am trying to decide between the B&O HX and APM. I have both here and am going back and forth and it’s tough! The cost of the APM is a real bummer once you add a case and AppleCare. I mean we are talking a $200 difference between the two. But the connectivity, transparency, and ANC are all top notch on the APM while they are merely acceptable on the HX. But comfort is only sufficient on the APM and pretty good (read better) on the HX. Also, the HX crushes the APM in battery life. My APM lost 20% overnight out of the case. I assume that’s an anomaly.

It’s tough to decide and clear that no one really has cracked this just yet.
 

nrvna76

macrumors 65816
Aug 4, 2010
1,243
1,268
Any updates? I am trying to decide between the B&O HX and APM. I have both here and am going back and forth and it’s tough! The cost of the APM is a real bummer once you add a case and AppleCare. I mean we are talking a $200 difference between the two. But the connectivity, transparency, and ANC are all top notch on the APM while they are merely acceptable on the HX. But comfort is only sufficient on the APM and pretty good (read better) on the HX. Also, the HX crushes the APM in battery life. My APM lost 20% overnight out of the case. I assume that’s an anomaly.

It’s tough to decide and clear that no one really has cracked this just yet.
I'm not going to argue about the case as you've made your thoughts on the Apple case very clear, lol. However, I'm not sure how you can throw AppleCare into the mix for the cost difference. It is a feature that Apple offers you but you certainly don't have to buy it, and I'm guessing (I really don't know..) that B&O does not offer anything similar.
 

Cashmonee

macrumors 65832
May 27, 2006
1,504
1,245
For the case, I know there are cheaper options but most of them seem to have an issue that I don’t want to mess with. That’s why I am pricing the Waterfield case. So yes, I could definitely go cheaper there. Again, if Apple had included a simple case like the B&O hard case, then this would be moot. To me this is an added cost that Apple is passing on and it’s a knock against them. For the record, B&O did the same thing with the H9 and I also criticized that.

There are a couple reasons I am including AppleCare+. First, I have owned enough gen 1 Apple products (dating to the original Intel MacBook Pro) to know that you probably want AppleCare. If this were the second or later iteration, I would probably skip it depending on people’s experiences. Second, B&O have a 3 year warranty and from what I hear, they offer very good service. One person had the H9i and got the H9 3rd gen as a replacement. As you suspected, it doesn’t not cover accidental damage, but I believe they are pretty liberal with how they apply the warranty. So yeah, not one-to-one for sure and I could see why someone would skip AppleCare. So it isn’t fair necessarily to blanket include it. I do appreciate that Apple gives the option and I am not knocking it other than in this space, a longer limited warranty would be good.

I am not trying to sabotage the APM. In fact, if someone were to hold a gun to my head right now, I would probably choose them over the HX. For me, it comes down to the fact that if I keep the APM, I will spend $150 on AppleCare+ and the Waterfield case. With the HX, I have nothing to add. So in my mind, we are looking at a $200+ difference after taxes.
 

hsiunghsiung

macrumors member
Original poster
Dec 27, 2020
36
17
Since then, I've decided on the APMs and am returning the h95s. Mainly because I enjoy listening to music and stuff on the APMs and I really like the transparency mode which I use most of the time to hear if my wife or baby calls out for me. Comfort wasnt an issue at all for me with h95 or APMs since Ive been using them (3+ hour sessions with glasses on, but I have a small head again). I did start getting some condensation in the APMs since the weather got warmer here (60-70s F), but since I have applecare+, I dont think I'd have to worry about it for at least 2 years. Battery life is still iffy as I lose like 4-8% in 7/8 hours or so outside of case? I can live with that though. It's nice to not have to power on and off the headphones sometimes and just put them on.

One semi issue is that when I put my APM on the headphone stand, sometimes it doesn't register that it's not on my head, so when I play vid/music off my iMac, it will be playing from my APMs on my headphone stand. Simple fix as I just wear them and take them off again.
 

Cashmonee

macrumors 65832
May 27, 2006
1,504
1,245
Since then, I've decided on the APMs and am returning the h95s. Mainly because I enjoy listening to music and stuff on the APMs and I really like the transparency mode which I use most of the time to hear if my wife or baby calls out for me. Comfort wasnt an issue at all for me with h95 or APMs since Ive been using them (3+ hour sessions with glasses on, but I have a small head again). I did start getting some condensation in the APMs since the weather got warmer here (60-70s F), but since I have applecare+, I dont think I'd have to worry about it for at least 2 years. Battery life is still iffy as I lose like 4-8% in 7/8 hours or so outside of case? I can live with that though. It's nice to not have to power on and off the headphones sometimes and just put them on.

One semi issue is that when I put my APM on the headphone stand, sometimes it doesn't register that it's not on my head, so when I play vid/music off my iMac, it will be playing from my APMs on my headphone stand. Simple fix as I just wear them and take them off again.

Thanks for the update! At this point I am heading to the same spot as you. The APM are becoming more comfortable overall. Transparency mode is great. The connectivity works pretty well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hsiunghsiung

hsiunghsiung

macrumors member
Original poster
Dec 27, 2020
36
17
Both H95 and APMs sound good to me, but they excel in different ways, and I think it depends on what music you listen to. I just did another quick test to hear how the H95s sound after using the APM for days.

All in all, H95s have great emphasis on certain vocals and certain instruments where it sounds so clear/sparkly and unveiled if that makes sense. Kind of like I'm listening to the singers/instruments play directly into a mic. The bass is there, but there's not much ambience, so it doesn't feel immersive. Also, the instruments or other sounds in the background that aren't emphasized will just feel like they are placed farther back.

The APMs in comparison, seems to have less sparkly vocals (more recessed in comparison), and the instruments like cymbals or acoustic guitars might not be as trebly/sparkly. The bass sounds full and ambient, but because of that, it might sound just a lil bit messy at times or after longer listening sessions? To me, the hits are clean, and the ambient bass lasts long enough to be immersed and not too muddy, but if I constantly listen to songs with heavy/hard hitting bass, I think I might get that overwhelming messy bass feeling after some time. Luckily the songs I listen to aren't all the same genres with constant emphasis on bass. The H95s give me the feel like I can listen to songs with constant hard hitting bass, and not feel like my ears are ringing after a long session, but at the cost of missing out some of the immersive ambient bass.

If I had both (not financially smart in my case), I'd probably use the H95s for more classical songs and songs with emphasis on vocals. Then the APMs for everything else like rock, pop, edm, songs on epidemicsound, etc. In the end, I just chose APMs for convenience and enjoyment overall

I did this video comparison just to give an idea of their difference in sound signature, but take note, the H95s sound overly trebly/thin/sparkly, and then the ambient bass of the APMs couldn't be captured well. This is because of the unprofessional binaural mics that I used.
 

Cashmonee

macrumors 65832
May 27, 2006
1,504
1,245
Both H95 and APMs sound good to me, but they excel in different ways, and I think it depends on what music you listen to. I just did another quick test to hear how the H95s sound after using the APM for days.

All in all, H95s have great emphasis on certain vocals and certain instruments where it sounds so clear/sparkly and unveiled if that makes sense. Kind of like I'm listening to the singers/instruments play directly into a mic. The bass is there, but there's not much ambience, so it doesn't feel immersive. Also, the instruments or other sounds in the background that aren't emphasized will just feel like they are placed farther back.

The APMs in comparison, seems to have less sparkly vocals (more recessed in comparison), and the instruments like cymbals or acoustic guitars might not be as trebly/sparkly. The bass sounds full and ambient, but because of that, it might sound just a lil bit messy at times or after longer listening sessions? To me, the hits are clean, and the ambient bass lasts long enough to be immersed and not too muddy, but if I constantly listen to songs with heavy/hard hitting bass, I think I might get that overwhelming messy bass feeling after some time. Luckily the songs I listen to aren't all the same genres with constant emphasis on bass. The H95s give me the feel like I can listen to songs with constant hard hitting bass, and not feel like my ears are ringing after a long session, but at the cost of missing out some of the immersive ambient bass.

If I had both (not financially smart in my case), I'd probably use the H95s for more classical songs and songs with emphasis on vocals. Then the APMs for everything else like rock, pop, edm, songs on epidemicsound, etc. In the end, I just chose APMs for convenience and enjoyment overall

I did this video comparison just to give an idea of their difference in sound signature, but take note, the H95s sound overly trebly/thin/sparkly, and then the ambient bass of the APMs couldn't be captured well. This is because of the unprofessional binaural mics that I used.

I know the HX and H95 have different drivers, but the sound you are describing for the H95 is very similar to my HX experience. This is notably different than the H9 3rd Gen which had a lot of bass that I felt was overwhelming and muddy. I too listen to a variety of music and the HX just didn't have enough low end. To me the APM handle a variety of music genres better than the HX did.

On top of that, the connectivity of the APM is far superior as is the ANC. Transparency mode is closer between the two, but still a clear win for the APM. Comfort-wise they both have some issues, so I did not choose based on that. They are both comfortable enough.

In the end, I requested a return for my HX.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.