This is a completely separate question from my other thread, so I figured it'd make more sense on its own.
I'm getting ready to do a bunch of full-disc (not recompressed) DVD rips, and I'm debating on whether .iso images or .dvdmedia packages are better.
So far as I can tell there's not much difference--they're the same size and the same content--but is there anything I'm missing? I kinda like .iso just for the fact that it's "compact" and a monolithic file from the OS's standpoint, but .dvdmedia does have the double-click-to-play advantage without the added mounting step.
Opinions/suggestions/thoughts?
I'm getting ready to do a bunch of full-disc (not recompressed) DVD rips, and I'm debating on whether .iso images or .dvdmedia packages are better.
So far as I can tell there's not much difference--they're the same size and the same content--but is there anything I'm missing? I kinda like .iso just for the fact that it's "compact" and a monolithic file from the OS's standpoint, but .dvdmedia does have the double-click-to-play advantage without the added mounting step.
Opinions/suggestions/thoughts?