Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Mookeh

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Dec 29, 2015
17
9
Hey all,

So I was checking out a YouTube review by DetroitBorg (or something to that effect) and he included a benchmark that made it seem the write speed on the late '15 Fusion is almost twice as high. Is there anyone out here who has compared the speeds? Cheers!
 
  • Like
Reactions: vng01

Ferdball

macrumors newbie
Dec 30, 2015
15
0
I just bought an 886 vs a 472 because of the difference in the Fusion drives. The 886 has a 128GB SSD, vs the 24GB in the newer one. I don't see how a 24GB Fusion drive can be faster than a 128GB.
 

Mookeh

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Dec 29, 2015
17
9
I don't think it is. I think the suggestion was that the new generation is also faster somehow. Do you know if they are the same drives?
 

zhaoxin

macrumors 6502
Jan 28, 2015
309
65
If it is true, it is only because of the newly tech applied on SSD side. We all know MacBook Pro 15 2015 triple the speed on the prior model.

So the same tech may used in the lated iMac fusion. However, comparing the 1TB version of Fusion, I still prefer the old version which has 128 GB SSD. As the speed of fusion does not only rely on the SSD's speed, also the capacity.
 

maflynn

macrumors Haswell
May 3, 2009
73,682
43,740
I don't think it is. I think the suggestion was that the new generation is also faster somehow. Do you know if they are the same drives?
They've improved the flash storage, so accessing information that is stored on the flash portion of the SSD is much faster then compared to the old Fusion drive, but as @zhaoxin said, I prefer the old one (or in my case the 2TB Fusion drive) because it has 128GB of flash storage.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.