daggle said:Try this link - http://www.systemshootouts.org/processors.html
You are VERY wrong. A 1.7GHz P-M would CRUSH a 1GHz G4.aplasticspork said:i thought it was 1.0 Ghz G4 is the same as 1.7 Ghz pentium m, but im probably wrong.
They seem to claim that there's a huge difference between the Pentium-M Banias and the Pentium-M Dothan. The 1.6 Banias is rated similar to a 1.8 P4, but the 1.7 Dothan is rated as a 2.7 P4. I don't know if the performance difference is that big or not.cluthz said:Systemshootouts.org also claims that a single 2.5 GHz G5 is faster than a Dual 2.0 GHz G5.
Their Pentium M results are way to low, they claim that a 1.6 GHz Pentium M is about a 1.8 GHz Pentium 4...
This topic has been discussed before https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/85347/
AmigoMac said:1 GHz G4 = almost 2 x 1 GHz Pentium 3 ...
winwintoo said:So is this some *new math* way of representing the speed of P4s or did I get hosed?
Take care, Margaret
ewinemiller said:Doing what?
I use both every day and outside of perhaps a staged demo inside the Steve Jobs reality distortion field a G4 is nowhere near 2 x PIII at the same clock.
4 of the machines here at the shop are an ibook G4-800, a dell insp 8100 PIII-1ghz, a dual 800 G4, and a dual 800 PIII. Depending on the task the G4 or the PIII has advantages, but typically will be within 5-10% of each other once clock speed is factored out and only a single CPU is used.
This is just the kind of statement that makes us look like a bunch of mindless cult members.
I can answer the equivalency question for a very narrow field. For the stuff I do (Carrara, http://www.eovia.com), based on rendering speed a 1ghz G4 would be about equivalent to a 770mhz Pentium M Banias if such a beast existed. The Pentium Ms are that wicked fast.
Now if you think I'm exaggerating, here's a more trusted source, Barefeats. Check out the Cinebench render tests. Pure CPU vs. CPU. Also keep in mind that since this test the L2 cache on the Pentium Ms has doubled and clockspeed is up to 2.1ghz.
http://www.barefeats.com/al15b.html
AmigoMac said:and how a G5 compares to a P4? is it crappy as well?
ewinemiller said:Margaret,
When you get one of the P4 laptops that are based on the desktop chips as your 3.4 is, they do some games with the clock when the machine is unplugged to get reasonable battery life. There are probably settings in your bios that control when that kicks in.
If you did the same check while plugged into a wall and doing something that requires the CPU to work hard, you'd probably see the full 3.4 ghz.
Regards.
AdamR01 said:Yes, actually when plugged in the processor will run at full speed, but when unplugged it clocks down to half speed. No matter what you do, when you're running on battery it runs at half speed. That is why i try to stay away from laptops with desktop chips.
aplasticspork said:i thought it was 1.0 Ghz G4 is the same as 1.7 Ghz pentium m, but im probably wrong. off topic, your signature says that you have a macintosh 1. if im not mistaken those can go for a lot of money because there aren't many left (40,000-60,000 USD). you might want to look into that![]()
![]()
--andrzej