Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

2298754

Cancelled
Original poster
Jun 21, 2010
4,890
941
http://bgr.com/2013/02/15/verizon-g...1/?utm_source=trending-widget&utm_medium=home

screen-shot-2013-02-15-at-9-55-48-am.png


Samsung’s (005930) upcoming Galaxy S IV smartphone for Verizon (VZ) may have been detailed in newly discovered benchmark test results. The device carries the model number SCH-i545 and is similar to the model number SCH-i535, which is found on the carrier’s Galaxy S III smartphone. According to results from the Nenamark benchmark site, the Galaxy S IV will be equipped with a 1920 x 1080-pixel full-HD display, a 1.9GHz quad-core processor and Android 4.2 Jelly Bean. The specs match up to earlier rumors, however there are some discrepancies.

The benchmarks reveal that the device will include Adreno 320 graphics, which means that the processor could be a Qualcomm (QCOM) Snapdragon CPU rather than Samsung’s new Exnyos 5 Octa. The company has previously turned to Qualcomm for processors in its U.S. Galaxy S III models and could very well do the same for the Galaxy S IV.

Samsung’s latest flagship device is rumored to include a 4.99-inch screen, 2GB of RAM, NFC, LTE connectivity, wireless charging capabilities, a microSD slot and a 13-megapixel rear camera.
 

The Game 161

macrumors Nehalem
Dec 15, 2010
30,987
20,169
UK
Damn nice

Is that screen suppose to be better than retina then?
 
Last edited:

mattopotamus

macrumors G5
Jun 12, 2012
14,738
6,109
USA getting gimped with more Qualcomm crapdragon I see.

Phones are at the point now where those spec bumps mean nothing to me. If you have a note 2, s3, nexus 4, iPhone 5.....those specs are meaningless. 1080p screens may sound appealing, but then again on a 5" screen you can't decipher 720 from 1080
 

Dr McKay

macrumors 68040
Aug 11, 2010
3,531
260
Kirkland
Phones are at the point now where those spec bumps mean nothing to me. If you have a note 2, s3, nexus 4, iPhone 5.....those specs are meaningless. 1080p screens may sound appealing, but then again on a 5" screen you can't decipher 720 from 1080

I can decipher pixels on my 4.6 inch 1280x768 display.
 

blackhand1001

macrumors 68030
Jan 6, 2009
2,600
37
USA getting gimped with more Qualcomm crapdragon I see.

Doubt it. Sounds like a fake. The exynos now supports LTE. The note II in the US had the exynos. And I would hardly consider the snapdragon s4 pro crap. It destroys the a6 in both gpu and cpu benchmarks.
 

DeathChill

macrumors 68000
Jul 15, 2005
1,663
90
Doubt it. Sounds like a fake. The exynos now supports LTE. The note II in the US had the exynos. And I would hardly consider the snapdragon s4 pro crap. It destroys the a6 in both gpu and cpu benchmarks.

Is that the same GPU processor you kept saying that about that didn't beat the A6 in anything but a single benchmark?
 

strausd

macrumors 68030
Jul 11, 2008
2,998
1
Texas
Doubt it. Sounds like a fake. The exynos now supports LTE. The note II in the US had the exynos. And I would hardly consider the snapdragon s4 pro crap. It destroys the a6 in both gpu and cpu benchmarks.

Could you post the benchmarks you are talking about? I am curious to see them as I have a Nexus 4.
 

b166er

macrumors 68020
Apr 17, 2010
2,062
18
Philly
I'm excited to see the S4. The camera and screen on the S3 were total dealbreakers for me, but overall I think the device is very nice. If they improve on those two areas I'm an easy sell.
 

siiip5

macrumors 6502
Nov 13, 2012
395
0
Posting 'possible' preproduction benchmarks on the S4? No one even knows if this is an S4 or a Note 3 or some other new phone. With Apple, it isn't hard to decipher a possible new benchmark because Apple only has one new phone. Samsung has several. Speculating on what this might be is an attempt in futility.
 

siiip5

macrumors 6502
Nov 13, 2012
395
0

Isn't this the same person that has been paid by Apple to "review" their screen tech? The same person that never criticized Apple for having a display well in excess of 226ppi? The same person that has heaped nothing but praise on all of Apple's products? I don't believe this is an unbiased viewpoint, which isn't helped by the fact that it came from BGR. Kinda smells like desperation.
 

cynics

macrumors G4
Jan 8, 2012
11,959
2,156
Isn't this the same person that has been paid by Apple to "review" their screen tech? The same person that never criticized Apple for having a display well in excess of 226ppi? The same person that has heaped nothing but praise on all of Apple's products? I don't believe this is an unbiased viewpoint, which isn't helped by the fact that it came from BGR. Kinda smells like desperation.

Yes.

Although I read the article the only information I retained was "Well, I guess iDevices won't be 1080p for a while." :)
 
Last edited:

matttye

macrumors 601
Mar 25, 2009
4,957
32
Lincoln, England
Yes.

Although I read the article the only information I retained was "Well, I guess iDevices won't be 1080p for a while." :)

Maybe people with 20/20 vision (or greater) will be able to tell the difference, but I can't even see pixels on my iPhone 5 or on the Galaxy S3, even if I hold the phones right up to my face (if it gets too close it becomes blurry), so doubling the pixels isn't going to do a thing for me other than drain the battery, quite substantially I would imagine.

I'm shortsighted and have to wear glasses, which is most likely the reason, but there are a lot of people who have less than perfect vision!

Like I've said before, 1080p in smartphones is a spec-pissing contest rather than a useful feature.
 

cynics

macrumors G4
Jan 8, 2012
11,959
2,156
Maybe people with 20/20 vision (or greater) will be able to tell the difference, but I can't even see pixels on my iPhone 5 or on the Galaxy S3, even if I hold the phones right up to my face (if it gets too close it becomes blurry), so doubling the pixels isn't going to do a thing for me other than drain the battery, quite substantially I would imagine.

I'm shortsighted and have to wear glasses, which is most likely the reason, but there are a lot of people who have less than perfect vision!

Like I've said before, 1080p in smartphones is a spec-pissing contest rather than a useful feature.

I do have better then 20/20 at least last time my eyes were check a few years ago.

But it depends on the quality of the video or picture. Sitting back for a television on SD I can even comprehend see pixels, switch to HD and there is a clear difference.

Google timescape video. They clear look better on my N10 then my iPad 3 and its only a modest jump in PPI.
 

matttye

macrumors 601
Mar 25, 2009
4,957
32
Lincoln, England
I do have better then 20/20 at least last time my eyes were check a few years ago.

But it depends on the quality of the video or picture. Sitting back for a television on SD I can even comprehend see pixels, switch to HD and there is a clear difference.

Google timescape video. They clear look better on my N10 then my iPad 3 and its only a modest jump in PPI.

I think that not only is it more obvious in a larger display such as that on a TV, but also more important. A TV's primary function is to watch things; a smartphones is not. Battery life is surely more important than a slightly sharper display.
 

ChrisTX

macrumors 68030
Dec 30, 2009
2,686
54
Texas
USA getting gimped with more Qualcomm crapdragon I see.

The Exynos chip didn't support LTE at the time the SIII was being brought to the US. However the US variants of the SIII received 2gigs of ram compared to only 1 in every other version. Compared to the S4 Pro in my Nexus 4, the performance difference is hardly noticeable.


I'm excited to see the S4. The camera and screen on the S3 were total dealbreakers for me, but overall I think the device is very nice. If they improve on those two areas I'm an easy sell.
The Camera in the SIII is one of the best on a smartphone today. Not sure what you're getting at here.
 

Technarchy

macrumors 604
May 21, 2012
6,753
4,927
Doubt it. Sounds like a fake. The exynos now supports LTE. The note II in the US had the exynos. And I would hardly consider the snapdragon s4 pro crap. It destroys the a6 in both gpu and cpu benchmarks.

Yes, I am aware that the Note features Exynos with LTE which would make the S4 a surprising decision unless Samsung has an Exynos shortage too large for a global release.

And I would love to see where the S4 Pro "Destroys" the A6. Last I checked, the A6 stomped in the S4's guts at just about everything.

Adreno GPU's suck. They're the Intel graphics of the mobile world.
 

blackhand1001

macrumors 68030
Jan 6, 2009
2,600
37
Yes, I am aware that the Note features Exynos with LTE which would make the S4 a surprising decision unless Samsung has an Exynos shortage too large for a global release.

And I would love to see where the S4 Pro "Destroys" the A6. Last I checked, the A6 stomped in the S4's guts at just about everything.

Adreno GPU's suck. They're the Intel graphics of the mobile world.

The adreno 320 is much faster than older adreno GPUs. On the CPU side the s4 pro murders the a6.
 

DeathChill

macrumors 68000
Jul 15, 2005
1,663
90
Isn't this the same person that has been paid by Apple to "review" their screen tech? The same person that never criticized Apple for having a display well in excess of 226ppi? The same person that has heaped nothing but praise on all of Apple's products? I don't believe this is an unbiased viewpoint, which isn't helped by the fact that it came from BGR. Kinda smells like desperation.

What happened with this Apple paying them thing? Google yields no results of interest.


Backpedaling? Looks like it.
I wouldn't count on it. He has said that the Adreno 320 is faster a million times even though it only performs better in a single benchmark, being handily destroyed by the A6 in all the others.
 

Vegastouch

macrumors 603
Jul 12, 2008
6,185
992
Las Vegas, NV
Dont believe anything till we are closer to release of the GS4. It will be fast, that i am sure of but dont really care what the benchmarks are. I care more about the overall size of the device and if it is smooth and fast and has good battery life.

Doesnt have to be the fastest phone going, just fast enough for me.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.