Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

acastic

macrumors regular
Original poster
Jan 6, 2004
141
62
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_3 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8J2 Safari/6533.18.5)

Do we have a general consensus on whether the new Airs are better, worse, or on par with the old Airs when it comes to gaming? I saw a few threads about Wow and Call of Duty, but what about games like Dragon Age I & II, Two Worlds II, Civ IV & V, Borderlands, etc? I'm most curious about gaming in OS X, but Windows 7 experiences would be appreciated as well. Thanks!
 

Oppressed

macrumors 65816
Aug 15, 2010
1,265
10
I was very optimistic until I bought my 2011 and sat it down next to my 2010 and ran games side by side. Long story short I may return this 2011.

IMO we need less theoretical benchmarks and more real world results.
 
Last edited:

babymor81

macrumors newbie
Jul 17, 2011
8
0
I was very optimistic until I bought my 2011 and sat it down next to my 2010 and ran games side by side. Long story short I may return this 2011.

IMO we need less theoretical benchmarks and more real world results.

i have the MacBookAir3,1 (11")

when i saw this MacBookAir4,1 (11") with it's i5 versus my core 2.. i nearly cried cause i havent even owned the 3,1 for a year... you mean you find 2011 pointless to upgrade? isnt it 2.5 times faster?
 

acastic

macrumors regular
Original poster
Jan 6, 2004
141
62

Wow... that's a big difference, especially on the first set of screenshots. I have a 2010 11 inch ultimate and can easily play Dragon Age II, Borderlands, etc without an issue. I play single player only and don't mind graphics on low or medium.

I'm thinking about getting the 2011 11 inch, but I don't want to compromise my ability to play games. I like the updated CPUs, backlit keyboard, and Thunderbolt additions, which is why I'm considering the upgrade.
 

Flagg

macrumors member
Jul 14, 2011
45
0
Wow... that's a big difference, especially on the first set of screenshots. I have a 2010 11 inch ultimate and can easily play Dragon Age II, Borderlands, etc without an issue. I play single player only and don't mind graphics on low or medium.

I'm thinking about getting the 2011 11 inch, but I don't want to compromise my ability to play games. I like the updated CPUs, backlit keyboard, and Thunderbolt additions, which is why I'm considering the upgrade.

Some games are reported to run better on the 2011's. WoW is not one of them, at least by Oppressed's tests.
 

major7

macrumors member
Oct 20, 2010
76
0
Porto, Portugal
The only way to find out is easy....you people start sharing your fps values.

I posted these results for 13"ultimate when i was having issues with the updates:

https://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?p=12369653&#post12369653

with all settings on medium/high and native res. (just followed the recommended) i got around 25fps for Killing Floor and 40 for CSS (Steam gaming). Also on SL 10.6.7

@oppressed

Are you using Lion on the 2010 13"? Do you notice any difference in gaming?
 

Oppressed

macrumors 65816
Aug 15, 2010
1,265
10
@oppressed

Are you using Lion on the 2010 13"? Do you notice any difference in gaming?

I was using Lion on both computers. They were a clone of one another. Not too much difference one way or another in terms of the effect of Lion on games.
 

major7

macrumors member
Oct 20, 2010
76
0
Porto, Portugal
I was using Lion on both computers. They were a clone of one another. Not too much difference one way or another in terms of the effect of Lion on games.

Lion is an update(10.7)...it could show different fps values....i had better values on KF with 10.6.6 that with 10.6.7.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.