Check this out, has any one herd of this ? A freand of mine works for a electronics distributer and he says this will be replaceing the Blue Ray players acordding to there company source.
How do you think this would compare to Apple Tv ?
http://www.vudu.com/
Hey, I wanted to get at you before one of the more belligerent posters writes and says something nasty to you in an effort to show how 'up' on tech they are. Vudu is quite old actually and has been around for not several years but atleast 1 or so. It's HD content (versus standard definition which is most download to rent or own variety like
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f40d9/f40d9887da4d1c079af3db8ac5cb58390e8d50e6" alt="Apple :apple: :apple:"
TV, Xbox, PS3 and so on) and seems to get some strong recommendations via a few of my tech friends.
That said, anything is possible but it's doubtful imo that it will replace Apple. There are many reasons but 3 simple ones are:
* distribution: Vudu is online or select retailers--while
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f40d9/f40d9887da4d1c079af3db8ac5cb58390e8d50e6" alt="Apple :apple: :apple:"
TV is in Best Buy, Apple stores and was in circuit and the Sam's club stores. Not to mention Apple.com is far more trafficked a website as is Amazon than Vudu.com--in consumer products distribution is 60% of the battle and Vudu just ain't got it.
* efficiency: Apple has iTunes which with songs, podcasts and movie aggregation alone--loading an
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f40d9/f40d9887da4d1c079af3db8ac5cb58390e8d50e6" alt="Apple :apple: :apple:"
TV for content whenever you want is simply easy for most average Americans. Vudu is no slouch since they do one thing, movies, but that said---seems highly unlikely that movie fans who are wanting to watch a film or scratch a particular genre itch are going to scratch it with a Vudu as opposed to an
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f40d9/f40d9887da4d1c079af3db8ac5cb58390e8d50e6" alt="Apple :apple: :apple:"
TV. Not saying, Vudu doesn't get good movies and have it in good quality but the
ease of finding content--any kind on Apple's machine is 10x better.
* HD movies are great but versatility is king-- when Apple has the amount of iPods sitting out there (20+M this quarter alone) and the fact that most movies (not HD not yet) can be ported between Mac PC's to iPods to
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f40d9/f40d9887da4d1c079af3db8ac5cb58390e8d50e6" alt="Apple :apple: :apple:"
TV's then the value of the versatility is king. While I think the
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f40d9/f40d9887da4d1c079af3db8ac5cb58390e8d50e6" alt="Apple :apple: :apple:"
TV unit is way overpriced--I cannot deny that renting a standard definition Hellboy 2, piping it to my iPod if I'm traveling and finishing it off on my
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f40d9/f40d9887da4d1c079af3db8ac5cb58390e8d50e6" alt="Apple :apple: :apple:"
TV is just damn slick and well worth the $3.99 I pay (which I don't like paying--digital movies should be far less than physical) as opposed to the high quality Vudu cost which can only be viewed on the TV.
That's just my opinion but one thing posters on this site forget is that the real bulk of America is not tech savvy, is not making $100K yearly and is not seeking the 'best' picture and sound--they work standard jobs and just want quality but efficient and affordable entertainment options and
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f40d9/f40d9887da4d1c079af3db8ac5cb58390e8d50e6" alt="Apple :apple: :apple:"
TV for the most part (the HDCP, not supporting DVI and the movie costs is nothing but BS crap) gets that right. So-no big future for Vudu.