Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

hugodrax

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Jul 15, 2007
1,226
643
the reason for no quad core i7 is because they would not fit in apples 45watt tdp case design. The quad core would require a case that can handle 45 watts.

The 2014 models are just stopgaps due to the broadwell delays. In October 2015 you will see quadcore i7 Mac minis.

No conspiracy, just a design issue.
 
TDP should always be taken with a grain of salt. Especially Intel's. Whatever TDP they advertise, Haswell has been known (in many cases - no pun intended) to run hotter than Ivy Bridge, at least on higher clock frequencies.

I thought was only true for first generation Haswell, not the refresh.
 
My Sandy Bridge Quad-core Mini has 45W TDP

the reason for no quad core i7 is because they would not fit in apples 45watt tdp case design. The quad core would require a case that can handle 45 watts.

The 2014 models are just stopgaps due to the broadwell delays. In October 2015 you will see quadcore i7 Mac minis.

No conspiracy, just a design issue.

Err, no. I have a 2011 (Sandy Bridge) quad-core Mini that has the same case (with 2 disks) as the new models. This is a 45W TDP CPU, so I doubt there is any good reason why a 47W Haswell part couldn't be made to work.

http://ark.intel.com/products/53463/Intel-Core-i7-2635QM-Processor-6M-Cache-up-to-2_90-GHz
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.