Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Heaven 4.0 Benchmark failing on 10.9.3?

M

Merlin65

macrumors member
Original poster
Jan 1, 2014
70
29
My spec is 8 core, 64gb, 1tb, D700 - is anyone seeing critical errors when running the Heaven benchmark (Ultra settings) on OS X 10.9.3?
 
Last edited:
I get the same problems. Heaven freezes then fails. The Valley Benchmark runs fine.


Process: heaven_x64.macos [452]
Path: /Applications/Heaven.app/Contents/MacOS/./heaven_x64.macos
Identifier: com.Unigine.Heaven
Version: 4.0
Code Type: X86-64 (Native)
Parent Process: ??? [1]
Responsible: bash [446]
User ID: 501

Date/Time: 2014-03-09 11:26:28.232 -0400
OS Version: Mac OS X 10.9.3 (13D12)
Report Version: 11
Anonymous UUID: 0E121C80-C854-AF67-5381-15BE389069D6


Crashed Thread: 0 Dispatch queue: com.apple.main-thread

Exception Type: EXC_CRASH (SIGABRT)
Exception Codes: 0x0000000000000000, 0x0000000000000000

Application Specific Information:
abort() called

Application Specific Signatures:
Graphics hardware encountered an error and was reset: 0x0000000e
 
I'm trying to run it on a HD7970. The original poster is trying to run it on the D700. Both use the same AMD processor. Anyone tried it on the D300?
 
Thanks for confirming it is not my hardware. I was starting to worry :)
 
Merlin65 said:
Thanks for confirming it is not my hardware. I was starting to worry :)
Click to expand...

You have no idea how paranoid I was since it has been only a day since I received my Mac Pro and I immediately installed 10.9.3 and I had a freezing computer!!!

I had cold sweats for real. :)
 
iBug2 said:
You have no idea how paranoid I was since it has been only a day since I received my Mac Pro and I immediately installed 10.9.3 and I had a freezing computer!!!

I had cold sweats for real. :)
Click to expand...

Why would you install an early beta build of OS X on a machine you hadn't yet validated? Seems like unnecessary stress. :confused:
 
VirtualRain said:
Why would you install an early beta build of OS X on a machine you hadn't yet validated? Seems like unnecessary stress. :confused:
Click to expand...

Maybe I shouldn't have used the word "immediately." I used it with 10.9.2 for one day, then I wanted to see if there are any differences in GPU drivers performance so I installed 10.9.3. I was eventually gonna reverse it back but I ended up reversing immediately.
 
Last edited:
iBug2 said:
Maybe I shouldn't have used the word "immediately." I used it with 10.9.2 for one day, then I wanted to see if there are any differences in GPU drivers performance so I installed 10.9.3. I was eventually gonna reverse it back but I ended up reversing immediately.
Click to expand...

I see. I guess you DID find differences in GPU drivers... Just not the ones you were hoping for :D
 
VirtualRain said:
I guess you DID find differences in GPU drivers... Just not the ones you were hoping for :D
Click to expand...

I too was hoping to see an increase in performance from the drivers. I guess 10.9.3 has a new way of controlling the GPU temperature by aborting early :)

Still interested to see (once it works) if there is an increase or not.
 
Heaven now working with the latest build. Not much difference in score. Luxmark is showing about a 10% increase with 10.9.3.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back