Been looking for an all in one desktop system for my brother in law for a while now and the imac seems to offer better quality and as good spec as similar Windows based systems.
We have narrowed down the options to (all 27 inch):
* 3.6GHz Intel Core i5 processor with 4MB level 3 cache; supports
Hyper-Threading and Turbo Boost = £1593
* 2.8GHz Quad-Core Intel Core i5 processor with 8MB level 3 cache; supports
Turbo Boost = £1684
* 2.93GHz Quad-Core Intel Core i7 processor with 8MB level 3 cache; supports
Hyper-Threading and Turbo Boost = £1848
Main purpose of the machine is for email, surfing, kids homework, photo/video editing, management of ipods/iphones in the house.
But my bro in law would rather get something thats going to last for a few years.
Is there much of a difference in the above?
Cheers
We have narrowed down the options to (all 27 inch):
* 3.6GHz Intel Core i5 processor with 4MB level 3 cache; supports
Hyper-Threading and Turbo Boost = £1593
* 2.8GHz Quad-Core Intel Core i5 processor with 8MB level 3 cache; supports
Turbo Boost = £1684
* 2.93GHz Quad-Core Intel Core i7 processor with 8MB level 3 cache; supports
Hyper-Threading and Turbo Boost = £1848
Main purpose of the machine is for email, surfing, kids homework, photo/video editing, management of ipods/iphones in the house.
But my bro in law would rather get something thats going to last for a few years.
Is there much of a difference in the above?
Cheers