http://www.nypost.com/seven/0626200...ying_an_iphone_columnists_glenn_fleishman.htm
They took a little shot ... overall, negative review I would say.
They took a little shot ... overall, negative review I would say.
You clearly haven't used phone browsers that shrink the screen - it's useless because you can't see anything. Panning isn't a big deal, and there's no good way around that, regardless of resolution, on a screen that size. Yes, a "fit" view is nice for seeing where things are on the screen, but useless for reading."You can't read much of an article on a Web page without panning back and forth across. "
Which is why a browser that has a mode to fit the text within the width of the screen makes enormously more sense on a handheld, instead of "the real internet" view... which is like looking at your computer screen through a small tube.
The download speeds aren't misleading - the thing has Wifi as well as 2.5G connections. The keyboard isn't going to be more of a pain that similarly miniscule "real" ones on similarly sized phones.If Apple hadn't so obviously and deliberately tried not to show this problem, then it wouldn't be such a hot topic now. It's the old "oh what webs we weave" problem when you try to hide things. The same goes for the videos of super download speed, and the idea that a 2" wide touch keyboard will be easy to use.
Which is why a browser that has a mode to fit the text within the width of the screen makes enormously more sense on a handheld, instead of "the real internet" view... which is like looking at your computer screen through a small tube.
You clearly haven't used phone browsers that shrink the screen - it's useless because you can't see anything. Panning isn't a big deal, and there's no good way around that, regardless of resolution, on a screen that size. Yes, a "fit" view is nice for seeing where things are on the screen, but useless for reading.
The download speeds aren't misleading - the thing has Wifi as well as 2.5G connections. The keyboard isn't going to be more of a pain that similarly miniscule "real" ones on similarly sized phones.
I have my cons about the iPhone as well, but nothing that'd stop me from buying one.
I did misunderstand your point, and I completely agree with you.I believe you misunderstood my comment about fitting the text to the width of the screen. I meant wrapping the text so you don't have to scroll left and write. Other browsers, like the one from Nokia, both display the full page like Safari, but then wrap it down when you zoom in. Makes life so much easier.
I disagree there. WiFi speeds are always given as max possible... I don't see any one of the carriers or vendors showing likely real-life speeds in their ads. The best I've seen to such honesty is T-mobile's maps of coverage, which I find refreshingly honest and usually pretty accurate.The download speeds have only ever been shown over a private WiFi network with its own dedicated servers. No real life there. Apple could've easily have posted on their website, speed comparisons so consumers couldn't claim they were misled.
As it turns out, I won't actually be buying one. I work for a... competitor. But, were I in the market, I think this is a great set of features, and I expect upgrades to come out - unlike so many phones where people almost never upgrade their firmware.Had no thoughts that it would![]()
You know, you can still go to pages that are optimized for mobile browsers if you want to.