Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

High res designs

aaron.lee2006

aaron.lee2006

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Feb 23, 2006
1,215
0
Ontario, Canada
Hey guys. I have a client right now who needs a high res logo for print. I have never done work for print. He said he wants it as high as possible which didn't help me much. What pixel demensions do you think I should use?

Thanks in advance,
Aaron
 
You will want to avoid using pixels and go with a vector drawing (Illustrator etc.) instead, if at all possible.
 
If you do end up using any bitmaps make sure they are at the highest quality you can get them. Also make them a lot bigger in rez than you need because you can scale them down in Illustrator or Freehand (the btimaps wont go all jaggy when it comes time to print).
 
macdon401 said:
...the standard for print is 300 DPI....!
R
Click to expand...


Nope. That's for half-tones, photographs etc.

If you want sharp forms on shapes, try closer to 1200ppi. With most imagesetters resolving at 2400ppi, 300ppi is lo-res for any shape that is at a 100% tint.

As an example, try rasterising some type at 300ppi and then printing that on your laser printer... ugly.
 
dogbone said:
I was under the impression that eps is basically crap and no one uses it anymore unless they have legacy files or are sending to a stone age rip.
Click to expand...


Depends on whether your Quark import filters can handle PDF 1.5 or higher... ;)

I'd always rather have an eps of a logo supplied to me rather than a PDF. Call me old-fashioned. :)

Some people just don't know how to put together a proper PDF.
 
Blue Velvet said:
Depends on whether your Quark import filters can handle PDF 1.5 or higher... ;)

I'd always rather have an eps of a logo supplied to me rather than a PDF. Call me old-fashioned. :)

Some people just don't know how to put together a proper PDF.
Click to expand...

I agree. I don't know about anyone else, but I too prefer an EPS of a (vector) logo. It's so much easier to work with.
 
Blue Velvet said:
Nope. That's for half-tones, photographs etc.

If you want sharp forms on shapes, try closer to 1200ppi. With most imagesetters resolving at 2400ppi, 300ppi is lo-res for any shape that is at a 100% tint.
Click to expand...

Are you talking about offset printing? I have never printed anything in offset so far that was higher than 300dpi, and all the printers i work with clearly ask for work in that resolution.

I'll try and send a job in a higher resolution next time and check out the results.
 
Blue Velvet said:
Nope. That's for half-tones, photographs etc.

If you want sharp forms on shapes, try closer to 1200ppi. With most imagesetters resolving at 2400ppi, 300ppi is lo-res for any shape that is at a 100% tint.

As an example, try rasterising some type at 300ppi and then printing that on your laser printer... ugly.
Click to expand...

Pssst... dpi and ppi are two different things. ;)
 
Coheebuzz said:
Are you talking about offset printing? I have never printed anything in offset so far that was higher than 300dpi, and all the printers i work with clearly ask for work in that resolution.
Click to expand...


Yes, but I was clear to point out that 300-450ppi was for images depending on line frequency.

Line work has to be in a higher res than that to be clean... for logos provided to us as JPGs or TIFFs we stipulate a minimum of 600ppi.

If you take a look at Distiller's press-setting you'll see that monochrome (i.e. bitmap), not greyscale, images are set to downsample to 1200ppi.
 
heehee said:
Pssst... dpi and ppi are two different things. ;)
Click to expand...

Pssst... I'm quite aware what the difference is. Pixels per inch is the correct definition, dots per inch refers to the line frequency of a screen used for halftoning.
 
Blue Velvet said:
Yes, but I was clear to point out that 300-450ppi was for images depending on line frequency.

Line work has to be in a higher res than that to be clean... for logos provided to us as JPGs or TIFFs we stipulate a minimum of 600ppi.
Click to expand...
Your place is generous; we require 800ppi. ;)

There are times it feels like, in the wrong hands (And I'm not referring to anyone here...), Photoshop is the MS Publisher of the Mac design world. We see more sow's ears looking to be a silk purse in that than any other Mac program. :rolleyes:

Snark
 
Snark said:
We see more sow's ears looking to be a silk purse in that than any other Mac program. :rolleyes: Snark
Click to expand...
Here here. I received "production ready" files from a client's agency yesterday. They placed Photpshop jpegs (180-200 dpi) into Illustrator and called it a day. Due to the low resolution and lossy file format all their packaging was pixilated and skin tones looked mottled. To compound the problem they did all their type in the same Photoshop files while they could have been done in smooth vector-based Illustrator. THEN they added 4-8 color Pantone logos in the final Illustrator layout - this was quoted as a 4C process job - Arrrrrgggghhhh. Why why why? Anyhow - I received a terse call from their designer this morning who was stammering on about how they have never had a problem printing projects at 150 dpi and that we should take our time to convert the PMS colors to CMYK for them at no charge. I let her know that our dies and spec sheets specify 4C for a reason and that she could change the colors on her own and resubmit the files or we would charge to do it. I just received the cover yr a$$ email from the client giving me the go ahead to produce this garbage once I have the new files. Just another day in the life. Oh well. Sorry for the venting.

Now, back to our story.
 
aricher said:
Here here. I received "production ready" files from a client's agency yesterday. They placed Photpshop jpegs (180-200 dpi) into Illustrator and called it a day. Due to the low resolution and lossy file format all their packaging was pixilated and skin tones looked mottled. To compound the problem they did all their type in the same Photoshop files while they could have been done in smooth vector-based Illustrator. THEN they added 4-8 color Pantone logos in the final Illustrator layout - this was quoted as a 4C process job - Arrrrrgggghhhh. Why why why? Anyhow - I received a terse call from their designer this morning who was stammering on about how they have never had a problem printing projects at 150 dpi and that we should take our time to convert the PMS colors to CMYK for them at no charge. I let her know that our dies and spec sheets specify 4C for a reason and that she could change the colors on her own and resubmit the files or we would charge to do it. I just received the cover yr a$$ email from the client giving me the go ahead to produce this garbage once I have the new files. Just another day in the life. Oh well. Sorry for the venting.

Now, back to our story.
Click to expand...


Wow a designer said that!!! logo at 150dpi they never had print problems.

Well my company are idiots they send me crop logos from PDF ads artwork. I mean send a CD with high res logos how hard is that. Awell you do the best with what is given to you.
 
dogbone said:
I was under the impression that eps is basically crap and no one uses it anymore unless they have legacy files or are sending to a stone age rip.
Click to expand...

Not true at all. And like some previous posters i would prefer a properly created .eps.
 
dogbone said:
Doesn't Quark handle .ai files? I haven't used it for years.
Click to expand...
Quark doesn't handle much of anything. :p I think Quark users are lucky that it even handle PSDs. That said, I just tried this in QX7 with a AI file I was recently working on and it worked. :eek:

Not that I don't enjoy the design horror stories, but to give my thoughts to the OP: create the logo as vector in Illustrator if at all possible. If it MUST be raster (pixel based, in Photoshop), find out what the maximum size it will be printed at is and talk to the printer to find out what the minimum resolution should be (this depends on a number of variables). And make sure you're working in CMYK mode instead of RGB!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back