Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

komatsu

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Sep 19, 2010
547
45
OS = Mavericks

When I do file search, all the JPEGS (10GB worth) seem to be in the iPhoto folder but I cannot access them?
I have checked the "Pictures" folder and no photos are there?

Does anyone have any suggestions on how to open them?
 

DeltaMac

macrumors G5
Jul 30, 2003
13,757
4,583
Delaware
Or, you can iPhoto to access the photos.

If you use iPhoto, don't modify the iPhoto Library, by moving, deleting, renaming pictures, etc. Do all of that from within iPhoto, otherwise you will (maybe irreparably) damage the iPhoto Library file. Copying pictures would be OK, but NOT if you change the file structure of that iPhoto Library manually - that is, without doing that from within the iPhoto app.
 

komatsu

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Sep 19, 2010
547
45
Ok I'm not near the system right now and I will give those suggestions a shot.

What is iPhoto? Why does it not allow native viewing of photos (in other words why does it imprison photos in
it's own folder)?
 

komatsu

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Sep 19, 2010
547
45
when I say "what is iPhoto"...I mean what does iPhoto do (or could do) that just storing them on your Mac
can't. What advantages did iPhoto offer to the user?
 

DeltaMac

macrumors G5
Jul 30, 2003
13,757
4,583
Delaware
You still can have access to the iPhoto Database, where all photos that you decide to store through iPhoto are kept.
iPhoto gives you (somewhat limited) editing and organization of your photos.
And some other features that you may or may not use, such as Faces, which allows you to label a few examples of faces, then iPhoto would suggest sometimes-accurate names for people, by interpreting facial characteristics. Sometimes useful, sometimes not so much.
Used to provide albums that you could order over internet, using pictures that you chose from your own collection. That's not available anymore, as far as I know.
Maybe bottom line is that the photo collection through iPhoto/Photos, nothing particularly special, unless you are OK with what you get. And other methods/software, whatever is your choice, is good, too!
Apple never has required that anyone use iPhoto (or the Photos app, which replaced iPhoto sometime during Yosemite, IIRC. )
But, iPhoto/Photos stores all the pictures in a single storage file, which limits your open access to your pictures, unless you understand the simple tips that are necessary to get at your pictures, whenever you choose to use your pictures in another way. Some folks think that Apple makes that process too challenging.
But, the fact remains that you still can get at the original photos, as you originally saved them, if you want to jump through a couple of hoops to do it.
Advantages? New Macs come with the software, making it useful without having to use other software.
Does it serve everyone's purposes? Of course not.
Does it do a reasonably good job, considering its limitations? Conditionally, yes.

If you don't like iPhoto/Photos, then you can choose to ignore it. It is not "imbedded" in the system like iTunes is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Weaselboy

Fishrrman

macrumors Penryn
Feb 20, 2009
29,243
13,318
What follows is my opinion only.

I never cared for the way "photo database editors/managers" (such as iPhoto, Photos, etc.) maintain their "libraries".

That is to say, it's difficult to open a library directly and locate your originals in a meaningful way.

So... my solution has been to create/maintain MY OWN "independent library" of original images. By "independent library" I mean that I create my own hierarchal "folder/file" structure on a separate drive into which all my originals go. Each folder has a meaningful (to me) name and date.

Then... in my photo editing apps, I go to preferences and tell them to "reference" my master library. The originals are always left in my master library.

This works for me.
I realize it's definitely more work than simply letting an app like Photos create the library into which originals are imported, etc.
Probably too much work for most folks.

But if you like to experiment with different editing apps, this seems to be the best "way to go"....
 
  • Like
Reactions: xoAnna
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.