The wired EarPods gets a lot of hate for no apparent reason. The audio performance of the price, and especially the performance of it's microphone is pretty much next to none at the price.
They don't really fit my ears, it get unpleasant really fast and I'm somewhat of a audio snob so I prefer to use my Shure SE846 instead, which are crazy expensive, creates a perfect seal in my ears and sounds amazing. Otherwise I use my wireless B&O BeoPlay H7 for wireless audio on the go as that's easier and more efficient.
But these new AirPods are really expensive. They might not be that expensive considering they are completely wireless without the need of a cable connecting them together etc.. These kind of headphones normally cost a lot.
The big question is; Do they feature the same drivers as the wired EarPods?
While the wired EarPods are quite good considering the price, these AirPods cost a lot more so they should also feature audio drivers and audio quality reflecting the fact that they are no longer considered being cheap headphones.
I find it really stupid how people hate on the wired EarPods. To me it seems like some people makes it into some kind of awkward sport out of hating on the EarPods without reason. They are rather impressive for the price.
But as soon as you are willing to pay a little more for your headphones you start to find a lot of options providing better audio fidelity and quality. And with the steep price of the AirPods, they need new audio drivers providing a audio quality that is more in range of it's high price.
And my biggest concern with these. Even though I will properly never own them. How light are they? With a "no seal" design and no cable providing gravity for the earbuds to stay in the ear. How likely are they to simply fall out of ones hears? The stem need to have some weight to them in order for the not fly right out of your ears while moving.
[doublepost=1473334003][/doublepost]
I wish Apple would just license aptX or Sony LDAC so we can just buy decent headphones....
We know nothing about the codec and specification of this new Apple W1 chip. So its really hard to say what magic source Apple might be using here.
When it comes to APTx, Apple is already using and utilising AAC over bluetooth on most devices already. And there is barley any meaningful difference between APTx and AAC over bluetooth as is. And Apple gets the added benefit of Apple Music, Tidal and most audio playback on Apple devices is encoded using AAC so it doesn't need to be converted before its sent over bluetooth when using AAC instead of APTx.