Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

rekhyt

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Jun 20, 2008
1,127
78
Part of the old MR guard.
I'm planning on purchasing the MacBook Air sometime later in April and will be switching from a Macbook Pro (Late 2008 unibody: C2D 2.4 ghz, 4GB RAM) to the maximum configuration for the MacBook Air 13" (1.86 ghz or 2.13 ghz, 4GB RAM).

How much would I miss though, and would my needs be too intensive/demanding for the MBA?

Parallel running: (Usual config)
  • Chrome
  • Safari
  • Skype
  • iTunes
  • Evernote
  • Speed Download

Chrome: 10 tabs+ usually. May get up to 25+ sometimes, with all the above apps open.

Adobe Illustrator CS5: Designing with the app with all the above apps open.

Would it work?
 

impulse462

macrumors 68020
Jun 3, 2009
2,097
2,878
LOL its a Core 2 Duo, not a Pentium III. You'll be fine.

+1

I don't really understand why people are worried that normal programs will run. Short of extremely-graphically intensive applications or CPU-only intensive applications, the MBA runs them like any other computer. Faster too with the SSD.
 

HardLuckStories

macrumors regular
Oct 23, 2010
244
0
UK, Manchester
+1

I don't really understand why people are worried that normal programs will run. Short of extremely-graphically intensive applications or CPU-only intensive applications, the MBA runs them like any other computer. Faster too with the SSD.

Because it has "Air" in the name people assume it's an airhead. As you said it will handle any normal computing task and only be slower in CPU intensive applications.
 

DNAppleGold

macrumors 6502
Apr 9, 2009
339
74
I have a second generation Air and it is way faster than my only slightly older MBP. Particularly if the you get the SSD, you will shocked how quick the MBA. You'll be very pleased.
 

leftyMac

macrumors regular
Feb 20, 2011
141
30
LOL, there's no "intense web browsing!" unless you need a firewire port or doing a lot of video editing, a MBA is more than enough.
 

wisty

macrumors regular
Feb 18, 2009
219
0
Some badly written flash / javascript app might hang, but it will probably hang on the i5 too. You can't outrun an infinite loop :p

Basically, you are asking if you need a Ferrari to drive through New York city. You don't. A push-bike is faster.
 

drbf

macrumors member
Feb 27, 2011
34
0
No problem, I can't believe how much faster the MBA is compared to my P4 Windows machine
 

rekhyt

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Jun 20, 2008
1,127
78
Part of the old MR guard.
LOL its a Core 2 Duo, not a Pentium III. You'll be fine.

+1

I don't really understand why people are worried that normal programs will run. Short of extremely-graphically intensive applications or CPU-only intensive applications, the MBA runs them like any other computer. Faster too with the SSD.

Slightly worried about the performance of the Intel C2D Processor (2.4 ghz) - my MacBook Pro's processor got hammered while exporting an Audacity file mp3 audio recording. Couldn't do anything - Word was literally dead.
 

impulse462

macrumors 68020
Jun 3, 2009
2,097
2,878
Slightly worried about the performance of the Intel C2D Processor (2.4 ghz) - my MacBook Pro's processor got hammered while exporting an Audacity file mp3 audio recording. Couldn't do anything - Word was literally dead.

Yeah, I mean I understand, I didn't mean that comment directed towards only you. It's a valid concern considering that these computers are relatively expensive.

Just the fact that as said before its not a Pentium III ;)
 

aristobrat

macrumors G5
Oct 14, 2005
12,292
1,403
Slightly worried about the performance of the Intel C2D Processor (2.4 ghz) - my MacBook Pro's processor got hammered while exporting an Audacity file mp3 audio recording. Couldn't do anything - Word was literally dead.
When I peg my Air's processor at 100% (doing something like ripping a movie in Handbrake), the rest of the system seems responsive enough.
 

gglockner

macrumors 6502
Nov 25, 2007
413
52
Bellevue, WA
Put it this way: the MacBook Air is far more powerful than the iPad, and the iPad is great for web browsing and email. The MacBook Air is more than powerful enough for web browsing, email, as well as Microsoft Office, iPhoto and many other general tasks.
 

rekhyt

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Jun 20, 2008
1,127
78
Part of the old MR guard.

Put it this way: the MacBook Air is far more powerful than the iPad, and the iPad is great for web browsing and email. The MacBook Air is more than powerful enough for web browsing, email, as well as Microsoft Office, iPhoto and many other general tasks.

  1. Wasn't talking about the iPad - was deciding between MBA 11"/13" and a MBP.
  2. I know a friend who is planning on getting the base 11" MacBook Air. He does 'intense web browsing' as well, going up to 50 tabs in Chrome on a white MacBook before crashing.

Would it be suicide to have such little processing power in this situation? (Especially when one is using the MacBook Air as the sole computer.)

When I peg my Air's processor at 100% (doing something like ripping a movie in Handbrake), the rest of the system seems responsive enough.

Wouldn't the fan rev up to 6K and the heat of the MacBook Air 85 C°+? (And how would you rip a movie using Handbrake without a superdrive?)

Yeah, I mean I understand, I didn't mean that comment directed towards only you. It's a valid concern considering that these computers are relatively expensive.

Just the fact that as said before its not a Pentium III ;)

Thanks. :) I was just concerned about the processing power of the MacBook Air, especially because I was struggling with processing power on my previous MacBook (Late 2007 : 2.16 ghz).
 

stockscalper

macrumors 6502a
Aug 1, 2003
917
235
Area 51
Thanks. :) I was just concerned about the processing power of the MacBook Air, especially because I was struggling with processing power on my previous MacBook (Late 2007 : 2.16 ghz).

Apple redesigned the architecture of the Air to remove the bottle neck previous generations of Airs and MBP's experienced. You'll be amazed at how much this little jewel can do.
 

Kissaragi

macrumors 68020
Nov 16, 2006
2,340
370
Im imagining "intense web browsing" to be like a cheesy 80s movie with muscly men browsing the web "intensely" and high 5ing each other with the final countdown playing in the background.
 

Assiduity

macrumors newbie
Mar 9, 2011
4
0
I'm also planing to buy this MBA 13" 1.86Ghz, 4GB RAM.

My take on "intence web browsing":
I actually was at the apple store today to try it out. I fired up safari with 5+ tabs and went on youtube, loaded a 1080p clip. While it was playing i opened a new tab with engadget.com and started scrolling down. And there it was... lag.

Thats a typical browsing senario for me and I really can't stand lag when scrolling. It wasn't awful, it was more like sirup. Noticeable tho.

I'l admit that the testing was done at the 11" 1.4Ghz coz the 13" didn't have flash installed.

My question is: Does that 400Mhz extra from 1.4 to 1.8 make that lag to go away?

You could argue that it is kinda stupid to load a 1080p clip and then start scrolling another page but I use an addon that automatically sets youtube videos to load at highest resolution possible to avoid reloading video when maximizing.
 

Apple OC

macrumors 68040
Oct 14, 2010
3,667
4,328
Hogtown
I'm also planing to buy this MBA 13" 1.86Ghz, 4GB RAM.

My take on "intence web browsing":
I actually was at the apple store today to try it out. I fired up safari with 5+ tabs and went on youtube, loaded a 1080p clip. While it was playing i opened a new tab with engadget.com and started scrolling down. And there it was... lag.

Thats a typical browsing senario for me and I really can't stand lag when scrolling. It wasn't awful, it was more like sirup. Noticeable tho.

I'l admit that the testing was done at the 11" 1.4Ghz coz the 13" didn't have flash installed.

My question is: Does that 400Mhz extra from 1.4 to 1.8 make that lag to go away?

You could argue that it is kinda stupid to load a 1080p clip and then start scrolling another page but I use an addon that automatically sets youtube videos to load at highest resolution possible to avoid reloading video when maximizing.

probably the Apple Store's Internet connection ... was there a ton of Kids in there doing the exact same thing?

The Air should do all that with no lag :cool:
 

forcetactic

macrumors 6502
Jul 30, 2010
478
7
I'm also planing to buy this MBA 13" 1.86Ghz, 4GB RAM.

My take on "intence web browsing":
I actually was at the apple store today to try it out. I fired up safari with 5+ tabs and went on youtube, loaded a 1080p clip. While it was playing i opened a new tab with engadget.com and started scrolling down. And there it was... lag.

Thats a typical browsing senario for me and I really can't stand lag when scrolling. It wasn't awful, it was more like sirup. Noticeable tho.

I'l admit that the testing was done at the 11" 1.4Ghz coz the 13" didn't have flash installed.

My question is: Does that 400Mhz extra from 1.4 to 1.8 make that lag to go away?

You could argue that it is kinda stupid to load a 1080p clip and then start scrolling another page but I use an addon that automatically sets youtube videos to load at highest resolution possible to avoid reloading video when maximizing.

Try typing randoms stuff on google with instant on. There is a bit of a lag there too
 

St. G

macrumors member
Nov 29, 2010
87
0
I'd awnser your question, but I've been on the web for a little while now and I need to take a break. This browsing is just too intense.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.