Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Yebubbleman

macrumors 603
Original poster
May 20, 2010
6,024
2,617
Los Angeles, CA
The title kind of says it. I'm curious at how many of your apps have either Universal Binary 2 versions or Apple Silicon only versions. For me, barring the things that I use a Mac for that will never make the jump to Apple Silicon (many Intel Mac games, x86 virtualization, and Boot Camp) a lot of my (remaining) basic Mac apps made the jump, though I'm still missing native compatibility with quite a few. How are you all faring? Are you lucky in that all of your apps are now native? Are most of your apps not native? Or is it a mix? I'm curious to hear!
 

leman

macrumors Core
Oct 14, 2008
19,521
19,679
Every single app I use on daily base is native. The only tool I use occasionally that’s not native yet is the Haskell compiler.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yebubbleman

senttoschool

macrumors 68030
Nov 2, 2017
2,626
5,482
All my work tools are native now including:

  • Node.js
  • Go
  • TablePlus
  • VSCode
  • Slack
Still waiting for:

  • Whatsapp
  • Spotify
  • Dropbox
 

edk99

macrumors 6502a
May 27, 2009
859
1,409
FL
Better question would be "What apps haven't made the jump?" That will be a much shorter list.
 

chabig

macrumors G4
Sep 6, 2002
11,450
9,321
Only a handful of inconsequential apps are still Intel. On my machine, I have:

- Brother scanner driver
- Dashcam viewer
- an ebook converter
- Amazon's Kindle for Mac
- Microsoft Teams

That's it.
 

Spindel

macrumors 6502a
Oct 5, 2020
521
655
Still waiting for:

AutoCAD
OneDrive
Teams

All run under Rosetta, AutoCAD runs really well and Teams and OneDrive just as bad as on an Intel Mac.

Would just be nice to have them be native. Hopefully they go the same path as MS Office and reduce ram usage by 50%
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Juraj22
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.