Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

youradhere4222

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Dec 16, 2007
323
78
The Sport band is obviously great and looks nice, but I thought it would be fun to discuss how comically high Apple's profit margins are on this band.

The watch retails for $50. My guess is Apple can make the band and packaging for less than $10. What say you?
 

EdisEdward

macrumors 6502a
Feb 4, 2013
544
145
It doesn't matter. The "costs" you are referring about is called "cost of goods sold" and results in higher gross profit. However, it may exclude other costs associated in the development of the bands (r&d) and other indirect costs (operating overhead such as indirect labor and indirect materials) as well as operating expenses related to selling the sport bands, which are presented in the financial statements below gross profit so it doesn't get included in the calculation of gross margins, which is what most non-financial people look at. You have to look at a firm's EBITDA or EBIT margins
 

youradhere4222

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Dec 16, 2007
323
78
It doesn't matter. The "costs" you are referring about is called "cost of goods sold" and results in higher gross profit. However, it may exclude other costs associated in the development of the bands (r&d) and other indirect costs (operating overhead such as indirect labor and indirect materials) as well as operating expenses related to selling the sport bands, which are presented in the financial statements below gross profit so it doesn't get included in the calculation of gross margins, which is what most non-financial people look at. You have to look at a firm's EBITDA or EBIT margins
I realize there are R&D costs but those exist for every smartwatch and band produced. More importantly, they're largely fixed and recouped many times over early within the product lifecycle. In Apple's case, I would guess that their allocated R&D expense amounts to less than a dollar for each band given the number sold thus far. The same can be said for the other expenditures you mentioned.

I suppose I am trying to make a point that Apple is probably making, at minimum, twice the amount of profit on each band as other smartwatch manufacturers. But I am genuinely curious what peoples' guesses are as to the actual production cost of each sports band, overhead included.
 

exxxviii

macrumors 65816
May 20, 2015
1,423
557
$5, max.

A Livestrong band sells for about $10, and the materials look similar. The cost to manufacture an AW sport band is probably less than that.
 

AZhappyjack

Suspended
Jul 3, 2011
10,184
23,659
Happy Jack, AZ
I realize there are R&D costs but those exist for every smartwatch and band produced. More importantly, they're largely fixed and recouped many times over early within the product lifecycle. In Apple's case, I would guess that their allocated R&D expense amounts to less than a dollar for each band given the number sold thus far. The same can be said for the other expenditures you mentioned.

I suppose I am trying to make a point that Apple is probably making, at minimum, twice the amount of profit on each band as other smartwatch manufacturers. But I am genuinely curious what peoples' guesses are as to the actual production cost of each sports band, overhead included.

They don't make anything on the ones you don't buy. If your concern is Apple's obscene profit margins, then don't participate. I'd put this in the "golden rule" category - those with the gold get to make the rules... or in this case, those with the goods get to set the price. Whether you or I, as individuals, choose not to participate, I doubt Apple much cares.

However, I would direct you to the aftermarket. What is the build quality of those products vs "genuine Apple"? And what is the cost of each? Apple sells the sports bands at $50/pop because they can, not necessarily because that's what it costs to design, maunfacture, market and distribute.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Newtons Apple

youradhere4222

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Dec 16, 2007
323
78
They don't make anything on the ones you don't buy. If you concern is Apple's obscene profit margins, then don't participate. I'd put this in the "golden rule" category - those with the gold get to make the rules... or in this case, those with the goods get to set the price. Whether you or I, as individuals, choose not to participate, I doubt Apple much cares.
I disagree completely. There is room for people who like Apple's products but wish they'd adopt profit margins more consistent with the rest of the industry. Hopefully I can inspire some other Apple fans to ask why Apple sells smartwatch bands for two or three times as much as other manufacturers who sell what is essentially the same product. Not everyone is a stockholder, most of us are just consumers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrXiro

Rogifan

macrumors Penryn
Nov 14, 2011
24,723
32,183
I disagree completely. There is room for people who like Apple's products but wish they'd adopt profit margins more consistent with the rest of the industry. Hopefully I can inspire some other Apple fans to ask why Apple sells smartwatch bands for two or three times as much as other manufacturers who sell what is essentially the same product. Not everyone is a stockholder, most of us are just consumers.
Why does Apple charge $50 for the sport band? Because they can. If their prices bother you the only thing you can do is not buy their products.
 

andrewstirling

macrumors 6502a
May 19, 2015
715
425
It probably costs them about the same as the ikepod straps cost to make. They look identical and the same designer designed them both. They're currently selling for around £300
 
  • Like
Reactions: friedmud

srshaw

macrumors 6502
Aug 13, 2011
410
66
$5, max.

A Livestrong band sells for about $10, and the materials look similar. The cost to manufacture an AW sport band is probably less than that.

Can you actually still buy livestrong bands? I bought a couple back in the day but it wasn't more than a couple of GBPs. Sadly I wouldn't be seen dead in one of those things now or anything else associated with Lance Armstrong.
 

NovemberWhiskey

macrumors 68040
May 18, 2009
3,023
1,272
Actual raw materials: under a dollar. Probably more like 10-50 cents.

Labor: maybe another 10-50 cents per piece.

But royalties, advertising, r and D maybe up to 10 dollars per piece.

Rememebr these look a lot like Marc Newsons watch stuff. I would not be surprised if he gets a small percentage of all watch sales.
 
  • Like
Reactions: friedmud

JayLenochiniMac

macrumors G5
Nov 7, 2007
12,819
2,390
New Sanfrakota
Actual raw materials: under a dollar. Probably more like 10-50 cents.

Labor: maybe another 10-50 cents per piece.

But royalties, advertising, r and D maybe up to 10 dollars per piece.

Rememebr these look a lot like Marc Newsons watch stuff. I would not be surprised if he gets a small percentage of all watch sales.

Apple hired him as a consultant on a part time basis. It doesn't necessarily mean Newson gets a royalty for each sale that uses his designs as you'd expect when a company approaches an outsider.
 

Jefe's MacAir

macrumors 6502a
Nov 21, 2010
557
524
Pure materials and manufacturing? Less than a $1 based on Apples HUGE scale of production.

Proprietary fastening system, design, marketing, etc. It's likely they're losing money at $50/band currently. That will flip flop very soon and actual profits will be made. For many, many years.

Question is; How much will Apple charge others to use their fastening system for off brand bands?
 

exxxviii

macrumors 65816
May 20, 2015
1,423
557
Proprietary fastening system, design, marketing, etc. It's likely they're losing money at $50/band currently. That will flip flop very soon and actual profits will be made. For many, many years.

Question is; How much will Apple charge others to use their fastening system for off brand bands?
They copied the band.
 

Rogifan

macrumors Penryn
Nov 14, 2011
24,723
32,183
Apple hired him as a consultant on a part time basis. It doesn't necessarily mean Newson gets a royalty for each sale that uses his designs as you'd expect when a company approaches an outsider.
Newson just said in an interview he's spending about 60% of his time on Apple. My guess is he's more than a consultant.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.