Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

chuckee

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Jun 3, 2006
25
0
Hey... I'm sure most of you know that I'm looking into buying a macbook pro (made numerous posts/threads about it :p) and am wondering how much of an affect Rosetta has on the mbp (speed-wise).

I know Rosetta is the emulation software that runs non-universal binary applications, but does it actually hinder performance that much?

Is there a way to avoid this slowdown by adding more RAM?

Thanks.
 

FocusAndEarnIt

macrumors 601
May 29, 2005
4,628
1,112
It really depends on what application.

We could be talking about Word or Photoshop. ;)

And yes, RAM is a great thing to add to InteliMacs. :)
 

trainguy77

macrumors 68040
Nov 13, 2003
3,567
1
chuckee said:
I know Rosetta is the emulation software that runs non-universal binary applications, but does it actually hinder performance that much?

Is there a way to avoid this slowdown by adding more RAM?
From what I have heard it can cut your performance by as much as half. It can be better then that. However Rosetta take lots of RAM. So if your short on RAM it will be even worse. But it all depends on what app you want to run in Rosetta.
 

chuckee

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Jun 3, 2006
25
0
lilstewart said:
It really depends on what application.

We could be talking about Word or Photoshop. ;)

And yes, RAM is a great thing to add to InteliMacs. :)

I'm thinking about running apps like Photoshop and other graphic intensive software, but I also want to run apps like MS Office:Mac too. Is it too hard for the intel macs to run two Rosetta apps at once?
 

benthewraith

macrumors 68040
May 27, 2006
3,140
143
Fort Lauderdale, FL
chuckee said:
I'm thinking about running apps like Photoshop and other graphic intensive software, but I also want to run apps like MS Office:Mac too. Is it too hard for the intel macs to run two Rosetta apps at once?

You can get 2 gigs of RAM from OWC for about US$215. I'm getting this for me birthday. :D

As an alternative, you can download a universal binary Gimpshop. :) It's open source, so they're constantly striving for it to be as good as Photoshop.
 

dmw007

macrumors G4
May 26, 2005
10,635
0
Working for MI-6
I think that Rosetta does a great job. More RAM definitely helps, but for say
M$ Office, it runs at about the same speed as it does on a PowerPC based Mac. :)
 

chuckee

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Jun 3, 2006
25
0
benthewraith said:
You can get 2 gigs of RAM from OWC for about US$215. I'm getting this for me birthday. :D

As an alternative, you can download a universal binary Gimpshop. :) It's open source, so they're constantly striving for it to be as good as Photoshop.

I'm looking into buying Corsair Valueselect RAM.... 1GB stick is 80$ (a LOT better than the 300$ upgrade through apple :p )
 

apunkrockmonk

macrumors 6502a
Nov 20, 2005
772
20
Rochester, NY
dmw007 said:
I think that Rosetta does a great job. More RAM definitely helps, but for say
M$ Office, it runs at about the same speed as it does on a PowerPC based Mac. :)

It seems to take longer booting, but after that its more or less the same speed.
 

bbrosemer

macrumors 6502a
Jan 28, 2006
639
3
I have not noticed a huge difference in the opening of the Apps or how well they run under Rosetta, however what I did notice is that Photoshop runs pretty well under rosetta and it is my feeling that it runs better then Office, I mean they both run well its just well is MS office encoded that badly or something...?
 

aaron.lee2006

macrumors 65816
Feb 23, 2006
1,215
0
Ontario, Canada
If it is word processing you are talking about, download NeoOffice. it is free and has an intel compatible version. It is also compatible with Microsoft Word Documents.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.