I just bought a LG 34wk95u, an ultra-wide 34” monitor with 5120x2160 native resolution (named 5K2K). I connected my MBP 13” 2018 to it with thunderbolt.
Please correct me if I’m wrong, but the only way to have the maximum display quality on this kind of monitor, if to have :
The thing is, with 1:1 resolution, everything is way too small on screen, I can't read text. But with 1:2 resolution, everything is too big (and I don’t have enough space on my desktop, 34” becomes useless).
If I change font sizes, I can notice 2 issues:
Please correct me if I’m wrong, but the only way to have the maximum display quality on this kind of monitor, if to have :
- 1:1 resolution (5120x2160) -> native resolution
- or 1:2 resolution (2560x1080) -> because every pixel is x2 horizontally and x2 vertically, so the scaling is perfect and do not need more performance.
The thing is, with 1:1 resolution, everything is way too small on screen, I can't read text. But with 1:2 resolution, everything is too big (and I don’t have enough space on my desktop, 34” becomes useless).
If I change font sizes, I can notice 2 issues:
- I need to do it on every software (complicated).
- If I take my mac with me to work in a coffee, or just in my bed, font sizes will be wrong on the MBP retina display.
- Should I use 3360x1417 res, having a normal size for everything, but accept that the display quality is lower that it should be? (I have to admit it's still perfectly usable, but at 1100€, having a non-native imperfect resolution hurts…)
- Should I try a new monitor and choose one with a lower native resolution? (like 3440 x 1440). In that case, size of everything should be OK. However, I'm not sure how a native 3440 x 1440 resolution with same res monitor, compete with a 3360x1417 resolution downscaled on a 5K2K monitor, in term of sharpness. (FYI, PPI would drop from 163 to 111...)