Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

PabloS.

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Oct 17, 2024
3
0
Hi folks!

At the moment I use a 2017 iMac with Ventura (13.7) and it's perfect for all my needs.

Except for one thing. I need to use for work some specific old software that only run under Mojave (10.14) or earlier. Can't use the software above Mojave. What would be the best way and solution for me to run Mojave (10.14) on my iMac?

Could I create a APFS volume on my iMac then install Mojave on that volume and then boot in Mojave when needed? That's a possibility or installing earlier macOS like Mojave on a APFS volume is not possible or a recipe for disaster on my iMac?

Any other idea maybe?

Thanks alot for your time!

P.
 
Last edited:

PabloS.

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Oct 17, 2024
3
0
Yep, I indeed considered and looked for a software replacement and equivalent, doesn't exist unfortunate that's why I'm looking for a solution so I can go to the source and use the real thing.

Never heard of Parallels, I'll look for it. Thanks for the suggestion.

So creating a APFS volume on my iMac to install Mojave on it isn't the way route I suppose?
 

schnaps

macrumors newbie
Jan 25, 2024
12
3
Old OSes don't have drivers for new hardware.

The only one option - run old software in a virtual machine with the old version OS. This works pretty well.

You can also use the free Vmware Fusion instead of the expensive Parallels.
 
Last edited:

chrfr

macrumors G5
Jul 11, 2009
13,702
7,264
Hi folks!

At the moment I use a 2017 iMac with Ventura (13.7) and it's perfect for all my needs.

Except for one thing. I need to use for work some specific old software that only run under Mojave (10.14) or earlier. Can't use the software above Mojave. What would be the best way and solution for me to run Mojave (10.14) on my iMac?

Could I create a APFS volume on my iMac then install Mojave on that volume and then boot in Mojave when needed? That's a possibility or installing earlier macOS like Mojave on a APFS volume is not possible or a recipe for disaster on my iMac?

Any other idea maybe?

Thanks alot for your time!

P.
Yes, an additional APFS volume is Apple’s recommended way of doing this.
Before you do anything, though, make sure you have a good backup of all your data in case something goes wrong in the process.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ben J.

FreakinEurekan

macrumors 603
Sep 8, 2011
6,456
3,332
Yep, I indeed considered and looked for a software replacement and equivalent, doesn't exist unfortunate that's why I'm looking for a solution so I can go to the source and use the real thing.

Never heard of Parallels, I'll look for it. Thanks for the suggestion.

So creating a APFS volume on my iMac to install Mojave on it isn't the way route I suppose?
New volume is fine, assuming Mojave is supported on the computer. But it’ll be an entire reboot (you’re running Ventura and only Ventura, or Mojave and only Mojave). With Parallels, you’re running both at once - so you can be in your Mojave software doing whatever, and can answer an email or what-not in Ventura without the whole shut-down-and-reboot. Plus, Parallels will continue to work even if you replace your 2017 with something more modern.
 
  • Like
Reactions: schnaps

chrfr

macrumors G5
Jul 11, 2009
13,702
7,264
Virtualizing macOS on Intel just doesn’t work well- graphics acceleration doesn’t work and there’s a significant performance hit.
However, if this is for personal use, VMware Fusion Pro is free and there’s no reason not to use that over Parallels, if performance is sufficient.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ben J.

Ben J.

macrumors 65816
Aug 29, 2019
1,044
606
Oslo
So creating a APFS volume on my iMac to install Mojave on it isn't the way route I suppose?
Too many nervous comments without reason here. There is absolutely nothing to worry about with creating more than one bootable volume on your disk.


Your mac can run Mohave no problem.
But be backed up, of course.
 

FreakinEurekan

macrumors 603
Sep 8, 2011
6,456
3,332
Virtualizing macOS on Intel just doesn’t work well- graphics acceleration doesn’t work and there’s a significant performance hit.
However, if this is for personal use, VMware Fusion Pro is free and there’s no reason not to use that over Parallels, if performance is sufficient.
Doesn't have to work "Well" ;) it's just supporting a legacy app. Assuming it's not a legacy, like, video editor - in which case, back to suggestion #1 - replace it.
 

PabloS.

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Oct 17, 2024
3
0
Thanks alot for all your answers guys, very enlightening.

So far, I'm heading toward the virtual machine via either Parallel or Vmware Fusion. The whole reboot to swap OS could be indeed annoying after some time & being able to swap from one to the virtual other is a huge plus, for my workflow.

Thanks again all, much appreciated 🤜
 

iMac2019

Contributor
Aug 3, 2023
43
23
Riviera, France
you could also take a look at a solution I use : Vbox, which is available on macOS.


Keep in mind that by using a VM you have to share resources with the host OS.
In particular, keep an eye on memory consumption and possible swap slowness (in case of insufficient memory)

As mentioned by Virtualizing you have the benefit of having the 2 environments (10.14 and 13.7) running in parallel on an unique machine, with lower performance than with a single version of macOS running

Of course, such limitations do not apply to a startup on either one of the two macOS versions (10.14 or 13.7 alternatively reboots)
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.