Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

stuff99

macrumors 6502
Original poster
May 11, 2007
394
0
How smooth do you think the new iMac can run Leopard??

Will it have difficulty running it with just 1GB ram?
 

xUKHCx

Administrator emeritus
Jan 15, 2006
12,583
9
The Kop
Apple aren't stupid, it'll run fine or there would be massive repercussions in the IT industry. After all the release is 2 months away.

The last i heard Leopard will be compatible with G4s (and possibly G3s but not specifically stated.)

Going from the last upgrade, 10.3 - 10.4 apple actually increase performance, not like Ms with Xp - Vista where they took 3 steps back regarding performance.
 

Osarkon

macrumors 68020
Aug 30, 2006
2,161
4
Wales
I thought Leopard was coded to run better on Intel machines than Tiger does now.

If that's the case it should run better than Tiger.
 

66217

Guest
Jan 30, 2006
1,604
0
It would run perfectly in a MacBook Core Duo, do don't worry about it not running smoothly in your new iMac.:)
 

PlaceofDis

macrumors Core
Jan 6, 2004
19,241
6
its going to run horrible!! /sarcasm.

Leopard will run just fine if not better than Tiger on anything thats currently for sale right now and thats likely true for almost everything that can run it.
 

ViperDesign

macrumors 6502a
Aug 7, 2007
650
516
Utah
Leopard is another reason I moved to apple, can't wait for that release. It will be nice to not have to pay over 500 bucks for an OS upgrade! lol
 

blueicedj

macrumors 6502
Jul 11, 2007
274
2
how well will it run if you upgrade from tiger instead of getting a fresh install on a new machine?
 

72930

Retired
May 16, 2006
9,060
4
how well will it run if you upgrade from tiger instead of getting a fresh install on a new machine?

The same...you can even do a fresh install on a machine which had Tiger (just have to move your data through other media)
 

ModestPenguin

macrumors 6502
Mar 5, 2006
437
0
OKC
it wont.

You cant run leopard on these iMacs.

You have to buy a new one when leopard is released.

...

Seriously it will run fantastically. Get over yourselves.
 

elppa

macrumors 68040
Nov 26, 2003
3,233
151
Probably better than Tiger does at the moment.

The basis for this is that every new version of Mac OS X has run better on current hardware than the version which replaced it.

Leopard apps should be able to handle concurrency (and take advantage of multiple cores) a whole heap better, thanks to NSOperation and NSOperation Queue we are told.
 

zap2

macrumors 604
Mar 8, 2005
7,252
8
Washington D.C
Very well....this iMac will be the 1st iMac that leapard is sold on. You'll have to pay 129 to have your iMac now, but it would be the same thing as the one running 10.5 later in Oct
 

davidjearly

macrumors 68020
Sep 21, 2006
2,267
378
Glasgow, Scotland
Agreed. Leopard will run amazingly well on these new iMacs and any Intel Mac for that reason. There is also little reason not to believe this is the same for G5's and most G4's.
 

bousozoku

Moderator emeritus
Jun 25, 2002
16,120
2,399
Lard
I thought Leopard was coded to run better on Intel machines than Tiger does now.

If that's the case it should run better than Tiger.

That's it exactly. All the Intel-based machines should see quite a performance boost with Leopard, all other things remaining the same.

Those of us running PowerPC machines should wonder if we'll be in the penalty box with Leopard.
 

stek1961

macrumors newbie
Aug 10, 2007
26
0
it wont.

You cant run leopard on these iMacs.

You have to buy a new one when leopard is released.

...

Seriously it will run fantastically. Get over yourselves.

Funnily enough I just tried Leonard 9A499 on my new iMac, it installed ok, but not after failing to recognise the HDD.

Got it on with a bit of jiggery-pokery, reboot, white screen of death. I can hear the Apple Welcome Movie, mouse works, keyb seems to work although I cant see where to type...

Ended up with my Tiger partition buggered. No matter, I'm still in install everything and rebuild mode, back to normal now.

Works fine on my PowerMac and G5 iMac.

I don't think it recognised sth in the new iMac system, prolly the vid card, although install routine gfx are fine...
 

Craiger

macrumors 6502a
Jul 11, 2007
849
289
Funnily enough I just tried Leonard 9A499 on my new iMac, it installed ok, but not after failing to recognise the HDD.

Next time try putting Leopard on instead of Leonard and it might work better... haha just giving you a hard time!
 

stek1961

macrumors newbie
Aug 10, 2007
26
0
Next time try putting Leopard on instead of Leonard and it might work better... haha just giving you a hard time!

It's our joke name on the UK mac newsgroups!

To mimic our American cousins we referred to Jaguar as 'Jag-warrr'.......
 

Wayfarer

macrumors 65816
Jun 15, 2007
1,225
601
Funnily enough I just tried Leonard 9A499 on my new iMac, it installed ok, but not after failing to recognise the HDD.

Got it on with a bit of jiggery-pokery, reboot, white screen of death. I can hear the Apple Welcome Movie, mouse works, keyb seems to work although I cant see where to type...

Ended up with my Tiger partition buggered. No matter, I'm still in install everything and rebuild mode, back to normal now.

Works fine on my PowerMac and G5 iMac.

I don't think it recognised sth in the new iMac system, prolly the vid card, although install routine gfx are fine...

Let's not forget Leopard is still in BETA testing! :eek:

The final version will be more optimized and feel much snappier, just like other incremental upgrades. ;)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.