Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Do you use a Bootcamp?


  • Total voters
    81

Arctic Moose

macrumors 68000
Jun 22, 2017
1,599
2,129
Gothenburg, Sweden
I have so many old computers I can use if I ever need an actual Intel processor, which I haven’t in ages. I’m sure there will be a sufficient virtualization/emulation solution for any Windows resource I may ever need, if I absolutely need to run it on the same machine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Voyageur

verticalines

macrumors newbie
Mar 12, 2015
28
14
No option to simply run a Windows machine separate? I hate restarting any machine during workflow, Mac or PC, so I never found the appeal of Boot Camp. Granted this is my situation and I have a bunch of machines just because but I won't necessarily skip on no-Boot Camp ARM Macs if I had to do a lot of demanding work on Windows that needed me to switch constantly.
 

KPOM

macrumors P6
Oct 23, 2010
18,307
8,319
No option to simply run a Windows machine separate? I hate restarting any machine during workflow, Mac or PC, so I never found the appeal of Boot Camp. Granted this is my situation and I have a bunch of machines just because but I won't necessarily skip on no-Boot Camp ARM Macs if I had to do a lot of demanding work on Windows that needed me to switch constantly.
Agreed. I like Quicken for Windows over the Mac version. Right now it should still work in CodeWeaver’s CrossOver WINE app, but if it stops, I’ll just buy a Surface Go or subscribe to a cloud Windows service.
 

tdar

macrumors 68020
Jun 23, 2003
2,102
2,522
Johns Creek Ga.
There are going to be many ways to continue running Windows natively on the new machines. Some are more creative than Bootcamp. But if you want to run windows on your Apple Silicon Mac you will be able to.
 

Yebubbleman

macrumors 603
May 20, 2010
6,023
2,615
Los Angeles, CA
I don't use Boot Camp to dual-boot macOS with Windows. I use Boot Camp drivers to boot Windows on a Mac in place of macOS. Macs running Windows are among the smoothest PCs I've ever used. Case in point: My MacBook Pro (Retina, 13-inch, Late 2012) won't be among the list of Macs that are supported for macOS Big Sur. This means that, I have either two more years of security updates for Catalina, or, I can switch to Windows 10, where I can have AT LEAST nine more years of security update support, effectively breathing even more life into it. My Mac might STILL be getting security patch support past the point where Apple is abandoning security patch support for its first ARM Macs.

Seeing as I am at home on either platform, the ability to run Windows basically gives my Mac reasons to forego the landfill.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Voyageur

limo79

macrumors 6502
Jan 9, 2009
298
139
I was a fan of BootCamp when I bought my Mac based on Intel in 2008 but later I catched myself that giving so many options (incl virtualization) destroys overall joy of having Mac and use Mac OS(X). In other words it was used mainly because Office for Mac at that time was terrible and almost no compatible with the same product on Windows (especially if you write a VBA scripts). Also I started to use it because there were no H.264 hardware decoding on OSX that was available on Windows (NVIDIA GF 8600GT) so I can watch my favourite David Lynch movies without fan noise. After some time I had impression that I am not happy switching and sad thing that that Windows OS is far for perfection but much safe, reliable and supported platform if you plan to use your computer for long period of time. So I am not going to worry about dropping BootCamp because this move will give a consumers much better satisfaction to use a Mac without Mr Jekyll and Mr Hyde syndrom when switching between multiple OS. Some people may be disappointed but they can always buy a Linux/Windows laptop. One bad thing is that like I mentioned earlier - with Boot Camp we can use our machine longer (Mac OS lifespan / support is short) and now Apple will force everyone to buy a new Mac.
 
Last edited:

leman

macrumors Core
Oct 14, 2008
19,497
19,632
I occasionally use Bootcamp for games, if I need to test some software on Windows I use virtualization. Losing Windows gaming wold be a bit annoying, but one will have to wait and see how it will play out. Best case scenario, the new MBP will be fast enough to virtualize games (but I don't expect this). Worst case scenario, I can use one of the online services or just get a crappy used gaming laptop... all in all not a big loss. Certainly nothing to make me think about moving away from Mac.
 

maflynn

macrumors Haswell
May 3, 2009
73,682
43,740
I've largely left the Macintosh fold, one reason was the then rumored move to ARM. I have specific needs that macOS fails to meet adequately. Other factors included the buggy versions of macOS, where Catalina is the poster child, and the fact that I bought a PC laptop that cost me 2k, but a similarly configured Mac would have run in the 4k range.

I am intrigued by the ARM macs, and I was impressed by the presentation, but for my daily driver, it will be a windows machine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Voyageur

Xack

macrumors member
Oct 27, 2016
40
59
I bought a new Intel Mac while I still could. I feel there will be a rush and maybe scalpers will take advantage of the Intel Mac shortage if a deal with Microsoft isn’t made.
 

Xack

macrumors member
Oct 27, 2016
40
59
I mean they offer a way to install and licence Windows on Arm for either Bootcamp or virtualization.
 

t90

macrumors newbie
Apr 15, 2020
14
4
I bought a new Intel Mac while I still could. I feel there will be a rush and maybe scalpers will take advantage of the Intel Mac shortage if a deal with Microsoft isn’t made.

That may be a possibility even if such a deal is made.

The only reason I see for running Windows on a Mac (either bootcamp or virtualisation) is for non macOS software. But from what I gather software support for Windows ARM is poor at this point anyway making it nowhere near as useful as x86 windows.

I’m in the camp of trying to decide at the moment if I should buy the MP 7.1 or wait it out with my current machine!
 

Boyd01

Moderator
Staff member
Feb 21, 2012
7,947
4,879
New Jersey Pine Barrens
Just got a loaded (i7/64gb/2tb) Mini and have installed Windows 10 with Parallels. This new system will replace two old Macs and a Windows 7 PC (which I use for specialized GIS software). So far, so good, I'm also running 32-bit legacy Mac apps in a Sierra virtual machine under Parallels.

I considered using Bootcamp for Windows, which would offer better performance. But then I couldn't use a Mac at the same time as Windows. I work with some huge GIS files on Windows, and it often takes a long time to export raster imagery or other files. I need to continue using a Mac at those times, so losing a bit of performance is an acceptable compromise.

The ARM Macs seem to hold a lot of promise, and in a few years I might be ready for one. But I'm quite happy with Intel for now. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Voyageur and D.T.

Voyageur

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Mar 22, 2019
262
243
Moscow, Russia
No option to simply run a Windows machine separate?
Thank you. Added the corresponding response option.
I’m in the camp of trying to decide at the moment if I should buy the MP 7.1 or wait it out with my current machine!
At the moment, I have exactly the same thoughts. I am inclined to take 7.1 and in 5 years+, фтв when everything calms down, look at the situation. But after the presentation of new AS Macs at the end of this year.
 

Cycling Asia

macrumors 6502
Mar 19, 2016
273
217
There's no option to "Walk away from Apple". I currently use Macs because of the following:
1. They're great UNIX machines
2. They run windows natively (good enough to play modern games)

If my next laptop purchase is between a Windows machine or an ARM based Mac, I'm going the Windows machine. That is of course if they're still open enough to run Linux.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.