Airforce said:
Disagree, but the iBooks are still ok for websurfing and battery life.
I love it when folks throw out negative remarks, but don't bother to back them up... disagree why? What do we learn from "I disagree"? That Airforce disagrees? I guess it's important to know that Airforce disagrees... not why, what reasons, right or wrong... just disagrees... ooookaaaayyyyyy...
Really why bother with a remark like that?
On topic, I don't know if iBook is the
best deal out there for what it does, but if you price a Dell laptop with similar specs, you don't get it cheaper... remember, weight and battery life are very significant factors for many. To me, the 12" iBook is first and foremost a
PORTABLE computing solution. If I wanted a desktop, obviously, I would invest in a big monitor and all the other things that are advantageous in a stationary computer.
As is, if I need it to be portable, I want it as light as possible, with as long a battery life as possible, as powerful as possible and as cheap as possible. But you don't get the extreme of all of those in one package. There are PC laptops out there that are a lot lighter - but they don't have the battery life, or capabilities (f.ex. no CD drive), and are expensive. Some are much more powerful (Powerbook 12"), but don't have as good a battery life, and are way overpriced compared to what they deliver compared to the latest 12" iBook - exactly the case of "best deal for what it offers"... again, maybe yes and maybe not "best", but better than the 12" PB (cost/performance ratio). So bottom line, for what *I* found, the combination of weight, performance, battery life, and cost is very favorable for iBook and the best *I* found as a PORTABLE solution, which is what I wanted, and what the 12" iBook has been designed for. You are free to "disagree" of course for the following reasons... oh, wait, no reasons given. Gotcha.