To take 3D pictures and preview them on its 3D screen.
But the screen should have more resolution than the current ones for web browsing.
I've had an HTC EVO 3D since launch, 540 x 960, solid phone.
Yes, I had seen that Phone, but it is old now.
I never cared about HTC as they were just a Windows phone box-shifter.
Maybe they make good Android phones now, but I don't see them in the same category as the traditional manufacturers (which can make worse phones).
HTC is a very good company. My Dad uses an HTC Phone and I had an Aria that I loved. They make great phones
I don't know. Many phones look plasticky.
I guess its all personal taste. I like plastic. It is a better shock absorber. To each his own
They're definitely up there as one of, if not "the premium" top notch android oem's.
The problem is that, that it just feels OEM.
Curious what this means? How can something feel "original equipment manufacturer"?
Maybe we're missing something?Curious what this means? How can something feel "original equipment manufacturer"?
The company feels like just an OEM.
I don't know. Many phones look plasticky.
The company feels like just an OEM.
The company feels like just an OEM.
I really can't see the point of this thread. You want an 3D phone, but you refuse to accept products from HTC (and or maybe LG since they also had some 3D phones?) because they are "OEM"? By your definition, every Android manufacturer is an "OEM" since they are just getting the software from Google and then slapping their own custom UI on top of it (like Sense, Touchwiz, Optimus UI, Motoblur etc etc.) and tweaking the Linux kernel to work on their own hardware.
I said "just OEM". Sony for example, might be an Android OEM, but they make a lot of other products fully by themselves.
Not really, but if that is your reason why you wont buy a HTC, thats lame. LG makes other products too.
HTC phones are actually pretty good. I just dont like that there is no microsdcard expansion slot.