Question, for those who know better (than me) how the Fusion Drive concept works IRL.
I'm working with a lot of fairly big Photoshop files (average file size 700-1400 megs), and the saving of these files (onto the 2,12 TB Fusion Drive) takes roughly 10-15 secs each.
Now I am assuming that the machine understands that the proper resting place for these files is on the HDD -part of the fusion Drive, but my question is: is MacOS optimizing the saving process by first saving them onto the SSD and then (when it can spare the time) transferring them to the HDD, or is it throwing them onto the HDD right away?
The question is relevant to me, as I will sooner or later need to expand the iMac's storage, and if the speeds/saving times I am now seeing are based on the machine saving the ≈1 gig PSD's straight onto the HDD, then I might splurge on a TB-SSD expansion...
TIA & RGDS,
Pekka
I'm working with a lot of fairly big Photoshop files (average file size 700-1400 megs), and the saving of these files (onto the 2,12 TB Fusion Drive) takes roughly 10-15 secs each.
Now I am assuming that the machine understands that the proper resting place for these files is on the HDD -part of the fusion Drive, but my question is: is MacOS optimizing the saving process by first saving them onto the SSD and then (when it can spare the time) transferring them to the HDD, or is it throwing them onto the HDD right away?
The question is relevant to me, as I will sooner or later need to expand the iMac's storage, and if the speeds/saving times I am now seeing are based on the machine saving the ≈1 gig PSD's straight onto the HDD, then I might splurge on a TB-SSD expansion...
TIA & RGDS,
Pekka