Adobe: "Universal? What's That?"
Wednesday, 01 February 2006
Oh, Adobe. There was this memo floating around last June you may or may not have seen it, it didnt get much press about how this tiny computer company called Apple was going to switch their processor architecture. Not a big deal, I can understand how you could have missed it
but then, wait, werent you at WWDC? Didnt you give a press conference shortly thereafter? It would seem that since you had a good half-years head start, you could have at least given the Mac community something universal to whet our appetites. Well, theres the Lightroom beta of course, but I'm sure the experience is stellar with a beachball-ridden Photoshop.
Ok, well, maybe Im being too hard on Adobe. I understand that they have a massive number of products that they would need to transition. But in light of their announcement yesterday that we may not see Universal apps like Photoshop, Dreamweaver, Fireworks, Illustrator, and the rest until 2007, it would seem that they have been nowhere to be found during the switch. Since Adobe knows that the millions of creatives who use Macs at work would at least need Photoshop, couldnt they at least switch one or two apps over and then give us the suite next year?
In my opinion, there is no excuse for this. Their corporate line
"As we've refined our software development process over the years, we've generally found that the most effective way for us to support these types of changes is to incorporate this testing into our regular development cycle. This enables us to advance our technology at the aggressive pace that our customers expect, while also adding support for significant new system configurations."
doesnt address the fact that as one of the worlds largest and most important software houses they had plenty of advance warning to at least prepare a universal Photoshop for MacWorld. I could even understand an interim universal release sometime in the next few months. But forcing Mac users to wait until the end of this year or the beginning of the next (at which point well be using Leopard) essentially sends the message that were not all that important. And thats a shame.