Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
iMac or base MP?
- Thread starter frocco
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
I wouldn't say better.
Perhaps the iMac is better value for money, considering you get a similar spec'd machine plus a beautiful 27" monitor.
The iMac doesn't really have any room for expansion though (excluding TB possibilities of course), where as the Mac Pro excels in this department.
The top end IMac gives a very respectable performance, but you can't change much. The MacPro on the other hand gives you the ability to swap disks, change video cards, add in new cards. I've yet to find something that can tax my 8 core 2008 MacPro. I've changed video cards in it already, as the 8800 died.When I bought it I planned on keeping it for 5 years, which will take it to early 2012. Before I got the MacPro I was constantly upgrading a windows based gaming machine. I could argue that the MacPro has replaced the costs of upgrading, but at a higher initial outlay. In my Pro I have a disk for Win XP, Snow Leopard, Storage, and Lion, which isn't used much LOL
If you are looking for a computer that you won't have to or need to sell to keep up with software demands then the MacPro is a good bet for the long term. If you don't mind selling and buying more often, then an IMac might be best for you. Plus you get a free mirror with the screen.
If you are looking for a computer that you won't have to or need to sell to keep up with software demands then the MacPro is a good bet for the long term. If you don't mind selling and buying more often, then an IMac might be best for you. Plus you get a free mirror with the screen.
The top end IMac gives a very respectable performance, but you can't change much. The MacPro on the other hand gives you the ability to swap disks, change video cards, add in new cards. I've yet to find something that can tax my 8 core 2008 MacPro. I've changed video cards in it already, as the 8800 died.When I bought it I planned on keeping it for 5 years, which will take it to early 2012. Before I got the MacPro I was constantly upgrading a windows based gaming machine. I could argue that the MacPro has replaced the costs of upgrading, but at a higher initial outlay. In my Pro I have a disk for Win XP, Snow Leopard, Storage, and Lion, which isn't used much LOL
If you are looking for a computer that you won't have to or need to sell to keep up with software demands then the MacPro is a good bet for the long term. If you don't mind selling and buying more often, then an IMac might be best for you. Plus you get a free mirror with the screen.
The brightness of the screen makes the effect of the glossy screen negligable. It is a problem on the MacBooks however due to the crappy screens.
Tbh people only have themselves to blame if theres too much light behind the screen anyway. Even with an anti glare screen its annoying to have any bright light on the screen.
iMac has weak graphics card for OP's gaming request. 27" screen with that card? lol. Have fun with all the blurry scaling.
The iMac does have the whole yellow screen problem, I was at Frys the other day and the big 27 incher had it's screen yellowed.
That right there means Mac Pro.
AMD 5770 will do. AMD 5870 will be better.
Most important is that you can upgrade the graphics later to play more demanding games in the future.
