Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

iMac Pro new pics I believe?

Interesting that these pictures from the Final Cut Pro creative summit which just ended in Cupertino show up in France.
 
Design-wise, doesn't look any different from the "regular" iMac line, other than the fact that it's finished in dark grey and there's no access to the RAM.

One very nice feature:
Looks like FOUR USB-c ports -and- FOUR USB-a ports as well.
That's "doing it the right way" (instead of Apple's obsession of late to reduce the number of ports/inputs).

For those looking for an "iMac re-design", the iMac Pro ain't it...

Edit:
Having said that, how much is there, really, that needs to be "re-designed" on the iMac, anyway? It's a very svelte package as it is now.
The only major design change I'd like to see is an easily-removable back panel, a la the g5 iMacs of some years ago...
 
Fishrrman said:
Having said that, how much is there, really, that needs to be "re-designed" on the iMac, anyway? It's a very svelte package as it is now.
The only major design change I'd like to see is an easily-removable back panel, a la the g5 iMacs of some years ago...
Click to expand...
The chin must go.
 
Fishrrman said:
Design-wise, doesn't look any different from the "regular" iMac line, other than the fact that it's finished in dark grey and there's no access to the RAM.

One very nice feature:
Looks like FOUR USB-c ports -and- FOUR USB-a ports as well.
That's "doing it the right way" (instead of Apple's obsession of late to reduce the number of ports/inputs).

For those looking for an "iMac re-design", the iMac Pro ain't it...

Edit:
Having said that, how much is there, really, that needs to be "re-designed" on the iMac, anyway? It's a very svelte package as it is now.
The only major design change I'd like to see is an easily-removable back panel, a la the g5 iMacs of some years ago...
Click to expand...
the problem is not aesthetic design.. You must buy most of the max or do in windows instead.
 
I don’t understand the bezel or “chin” haters. Long time ago Apple achieved to offer a clean design screen, with a black frame surrounding image in an elegant way. It seems a lot of mac users are into photography and film post processing. Well... I find useful to watch content against a black frame! In fact, not having such could be an inconvenient fault for designers.
I understand the interest in making portable devices even smaller, but if I’m going to examine a photo or image quality, having a neutral deep black bezel makes sense. I’m not a pro, but I believe designers could feel uncomfortable working on a bezel-less screen.
(And office workers find the chin a nice place to use post-it notes!)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Samuelsan2001, MaximizedAction and Precursor
Yeah I dont get the chin haters either, I challenge anyone to show me a more modern design then what apple has put out. I really dont think anyone else really competes from a design perspective. But it depends on what your preferences are and what style you like.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Precursor
I also like the iMac design (that is with the chin) better than the Thunderbolt display. I also find the bezel to help frame the working area. The bezels can perhaps be 1 cm smaller on each side. Edge to edge display? Perhaps, human have extraordinary ability to get used to all sorts of things.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back