Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

jackcohn

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Aug 12, 2010
12
0
What is better:

A: iMac with system installed on fast SSD + additional slow HD

B: Mac Pro (Quad-core basic version) with system installed on original slow 7,200-rpm HD + RAID-raptors for photo and video libraries

BTW, can I just add extra (Crucial) memory to existing original one or do I need to remove original and replace it fully with all the same Crucial RAM?

Your opinions appreciated.

Thanks
 
The iMac with a quality SSD will out perform the MP w/ any hard drive running the OS RAID or not.

The storage drive speed is really not that important of a factor in my mind. I would go with a low power low noise drive because it is really only used for storage. If I have new video or photo files I am first going to import them to a working directory on the SSD drive until I finish editing them and the move them to the HDD for storage/archive.

The MP will give you a lot more options for RAID/Storage though and easy access to upgrade/replace the SSD drives. A dual SSD RAID0 would fit perfectly in the spare optical bay. It's just not needed for most people. That is why I went with the iMac. The MP is way more flexible but I just like the form factor of the iMac and don't really need all those other options (I hope).
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.