This essentially represents the facing page pairs as single 11" x 17" layouts, and that is probably the bast way to conceptualize it.
Artwork that extends across the gutterline can theoretically be a single image that spans both pages and has .0625" bleed on all four edges. (11.125" x 17.125")
^OK, I get that and facing pages is the correct way to set that up. But I'm not sure what you hope to accomplish by, for instance, running an image across the gutter unless you want part of it to appear on the facing page.
For instance, if I'm making a PDF for press in singles ready for imposition, even though it's been laid out as facing pages, the PDF will have an asymmetric bleed with 0mm on the inside and 3mm around top, bottom and outside edges. If I had an inside bleed, material that runs across the inside edge would overlap onto another page on the same leaf, appearing elsewhere in the book.
I'm trying to set up the document to allow for pagination changes to occur during layout.
For instance, I layout page 122 (verso) to have an image go into the gutter. It later changes to become page 123 (recto). So now I have add a bleed to the image because it will be on the outer edge of the page. I'm trying to avoid having to change the bleeds or layout any time a page changes verso/recto or recto/verso.
OK, now that makes sense. Pictures are sometimes better than words.![]()