The workstation versions will be uglier - count on it
But really, when do you want style?
To me, the outright 'look at me' styling of the Apples is not required unless you're in a public situation, especially if there are compromises that come with the design - and boy does it come with compromises. That's really where I keep my POS 'image' machines to these days - the Air and the MBP. I give talks using Macs because of a) Keynote, although I've started a transition away to the Sony's / Powerpoint and b) it *is* an image thing. People see you with a Mac and still think you 'think different' to a certain degree - marketing at work, who am I to argue?
But away from those types of uses, I rely on machines which don't compromise so much for their looks, or are just better engineered / built all-round.
The portable / transportable engineering stuff is currently done on the Dell XPS M1730 (at least, this was how it was justified
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Wink ;) ;)"
) and the HP 8510w and the 8710w. If there are compromises in the product based on looks or function, I have to say I care less how it looks as a working tool, I care how well it works. And any of these will be a more dependable tool than a MBP, representing a better standard of engineering where it counts - inside. The HP's will also give you working options you'll never see on a Mac - proper docking stations, external battery chargers, etc that really do make it truly a mobile workstation.
You could do it the way I do - retain a Macbook Air / Pro to pander to the misconceptions of others for example, and a real machine for your core work.