I use Strata 3D CX 5.6 at work on a Mac Pro 2.8GHz. x 2 Xeon with 4GB RAM and an ATI 2600 Pro video card (2008).
At home I use Strata 3D CX 5.5 on an iMac 2.93GHz. with 4GB RAM and an NVIDIA GT 120 video card (2009).
Today I decided to render the same model at work and at home to see how much faster the Mac Pro is than my iMac.
Surprisingly, not much faster.
Results:
4000x2826 pixels
Settings: RT Best
Renderer: Raytracing
Texture detail: Fine
Oversampling: 9 per pixel (extra smooth)
Anti-alias
Render alpha channel
Render to layers
------
Mac Pro: 18 minutes 52 seconds
iMac: 20 minutes 1 second
I really thought the Mac Pro would be nearly twice as fast or more. I wonder if anyone else has tested an iMac against a Mac Pro with their professional apps?
I wonder if this test only shows how much work Strata needs to do to optimize its apps to the Mac Pros much more capable processors?
At home I use Strata 3D CX 5.5 on an iMac 2.93GHz. with 4GB RAM and an NVIDIA GT 120 video card (2009).
Today I decided to render the same model at work and at home to see how much faster the Mac Pro is than my iMac.
Surprisingly, not much faster.
Results:
4000x2826 pixels
Settings: RT Best
Renderer: Raytracing
Texture detail: Fine
Oversampling: 9 per pixel (extra smooth)
Anti-alias
Render alpha channel
Render to layers
------
Mac Pro: 18 minutes 52 seconds
iMac: 20 minutes 1 second
I really thought the Mac Pro would be nearly twice as fast or more. I wonder if anyone else has tested an iMac against a Mac Pro with their professional apps?
I wonder if this test only shows how much work Strata needs to do to optimize its apps to the Mac Pros much more capable processors?