Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

1240766

Cancelled
Original poster
Nov 2, 2020
264
376
Comparing htop results with activity monitor. The swap is exactly the same, memory utilization however is very different. Also, looking at CPU utilization htop is showing aggressive usage of CPU while activity monitor shows mostly idle

I am running Citrix Workspace, VS Code, a small react app, a few safari tabs opened.... not much at all. Interesting to me to see memory utilization is less than swap... I am going to get the 16gb and try to turn off swap on it to see if I can get more memory utilization...

On another note, everything is running VERY VERY smoothly, no issues at all.


Image 11-27-20 at 10.20 AM.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: MyopicPaideia

MyopicPaideia

macrumors 68020
Mar 19, 2011
2,155
980
Sweden
I prefer gotop to htop - but that is besides the point. Possibly the cores being shown as fully loaded are the efficiency cores? Also, I think htop shows “wired“ memory.
 

Xgm541

macrumors 65816
May 3, 2011
1,098
818
It’s possible the power management of the new cpu is causing disabled cores to show 100% usage. Clearly htop is wrong. Even if you look at the cpu usage by process in htop it’s wrong.
 

tonyunreal

macrumors regular
Feb 25, 2010
234
38
Was htop running native or through Rosetta 2? The memory usage of only 952M could be the result of a process isolation mechanism at work.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MyopicPaideia

macbookfan

macrumors regular
Jun 17, 2008
117
128
Was htop running native or through Rosetta 2? The memory usage of only 952M could be the result of a process isolation mechanism at work.
Apple Silicone compiled htop left, Intel in Rosetta right. I believe you are correct.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2020-12-21 at 8.09.45 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2020-12-21 at 8.09.45 PM.png
    129.8 KB · Views: 786
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.