Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

mattspace

macrumors 68040
Original poster
Jun 5, 2013
3,342
2,975
Australia
I just noticed my iPad Pro (current gen 11") hasn't been receiving the security updates for iOS 16 since 16.7.2, and they're not listed as available in settings. I was under the impression that Apple had changed policy to stop using security updates as a way to push people to newer full-version OS updates.

Is that not the case? Or, is there a nuance to it I hadn't discovered?
 

Jim Lahey

macrumors 68030
Apr 8, 2014
2,743
5,681
I would just stick with 16.7.2 and roll the dice. With the absolute clear and present danger of the EU's Chat Control and the UK's pending amendments to its Investigatory Powers Act currently in the House of Lords, we aren't far away from government being a far greater risk to our privacy than the likelihood of being targeted by hackers. The UK aims to become the worldwide arbiter of big tech software updates, with additional power to secretly veto security patches that it doesn't like.

https://forums.macrumors.com/thread...ecretly-veto-global-user-protections.2417840/
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: DaPhox

mattspace

macrumors 68040
Original poster
Jun 5, 2013
3,342
2,975
Australia
what do you mean, you can't update to iPadOS 17(.3)?

No, as it it's not listing 16.7.3 onwards as update options. There were several 16.x updates released after 17 that people with 17 compatible devices could use, if they didn't want to move to the newer feature-update OS.
 

Jim Lahey

macrumors 68030
Apr 8, 2014
2,743
5,681
No, as it it's not listing 16.7.3 onwards as update options. There were several 16.x updates released after 17 that people with 17 compatible devices could use, if they didn't want to move to the newer feature-update OS.

I’m maxed out at 16.7.2 on iPhone. Next available listed update is 17.3 👍
 

FeliApple

macrumors 68040
Apr 8, 2015
3,684
2,088
This:


is the policy to which I was referring.
That is temporary. They temporarily allow both, but they later disallow staying on the same major version.

If the whole point of that is “security”, then it’s pointless, in my opinion.

I’d just keep your iPad on its original iOS version, it’ll work fine forever.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Digitalguy

chrfr

macrumors G5
Jul 11, 2009
13,707
7,277
I’d upgrade. 17.3 works very well on iPads. There are no performance negatives to being on 17, especially so for devices that have M1 and M2 processors.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Reverend Benny

Digitalguy

macrumors 601
Apr 15, 2019
4,643
4,469
This:


is the policy to which I was referring.
As already mentioned by FeliApple, this policy has long been abandoned... So if you care about security you have to update (I don't but I updated because of features). I only stayed on 16 (or 15) for now with devices with 4GB RAM or less, but updated anything with 6GB or 8GB. No major issues. Again I don't do it for security, I couldn't care less about security on iPadOS, risks are virtually 0.
 

mattspace

macrumors 68040
Original poster
Jun 5, 2013
3,342
2,975
Australia
I’d upgrade. 17.3 works very well on iPads. There are no performance negatives to being on 17, especially so for devices that have M1 and M2 processors.

my concern is more breaking edge case stuff - for example, my ipad when connected via sidecar, even if its screen is locked, allows old pre-subscription versions of SketchUP to show dimensions correctly oriented on my mac.

Yes it's weird, but just connecting to sidecar changes the way OpenGL works on a Mac, so measurements in SketchUP aren't backwards and upside-down.
 

darngooddesign

macrumors P6
Jul 4, 2007
18,362
10,114
Atlanta, GA
I just noticed my iPad Pro (current gen 11") hasn't been receiving the security updates for iOS 16 since 16.7.2, and they're not listed as available in settings. I was under the impression that Apple had changed policy to stop using security updates as a way to push people to newer full-version OS updates.

Is that not the case? Or, is there a nuance to it I hadn't discovered?
My 2015 9.7" iPad Pro recently received the 16.7.5 security/bugfix update.
 

darngooddesign

macrumors P6
Jul 4, 2007
18,362
10,114
Atlanta, GA
yeah, it seems 16.x updates are till being made available for devices that don't support 17.
Its fun to think that every action is nefarious, but really the truth is much simpler.

Screenshot 2024-02-05 at 9.25.47 AM.png

 

winxmac

macrumors 68000
Sep 1, 2021
1,560
1,824
I have both iPhone 11 Pro Max and iPhone 14 Pro Max running iOS 16.7 and was hoping to be able to download minor updates to iOS 16 but that is no longer possible and the reason I decided to keep my iPhone 14 Pro Max instead of selling it for some cash...

They should have limited iOS 17 for A14 Bionic devices and newer while iPadOS 17 for A12 Bionic devices and newer...
 

Member2010

macrumors regular
Jun 28, 2013
144
7
I'd say that this is "classic" Apple forced obsolescence software garbage, but the phenomenon is actually somewhat recent (since Jobs left the company, at least).
 

mattspace

macrumors 68040
Original poster
Jun 5, 2013
3,342
2,975
Australia
Its fun to think that every action is nefarious, but really the truth is much simpler.

View attachment 2345771


That doesn't explain anything.

That just states the situation - Apple is refusing to provide 16.x updates for devices that are 17.x capable, despite the fact they were doing it up to 16.7.2 (which post-dated the release of 17), which is now 3 point versions of security updates out of date.

So your choice is update to 17 and risk edge-case breakage, for which there isn't a rollback option, or sit on an insecure OS version (with that passive-aggressive red dot on the setting app icon).
 
  • Like
Reactions: IngoX

IngoX

macrumors regular
Jan 4, 2022
140
98
Sweden
I'd say that this is "classic" Apple forced obsolescence software garbage, but the phenomenon is actually somewhat recent (since Jobs left the company, at least).
Well, as long as Jobs were here you actually had to buy every major Mac OS X release if you wanted to update your computer, remember? Last one was 10.8 Mountain Lion for $19 in 2012, so it is an even more recent phenomenon to get major updates for free… 😛

Regarding iOS, what I can recall it has always been that Apple wants to push out the latest major version software to all units that are compatible, but also have had a good track record providing critical security updates to units stuck on older iOS-versions.

Problem is for those who voluntarily want to stick to older versions.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: DaPhox and kitKAC

Reverend Benny

macrumors 65816
Apr 28, 2017
1,186
932
Europe
my concern is more breaking edge case stuff - for example, my ipad when connected via sidecar, even if its screen is locked, allows old pre-subscription versions of SketchUP to show dimensions correctly oriented on my mac.

Yes it's weird, but just connecting to sidecar changes the way OpenGL works on a Mac, so measurements in SketchUP aren't backwards and upside-down.
I've been using 17.3 for a while and it works fine but you state a good case for looking into it a bit further before upgrading.

I can imagine (guessing here) that features like sidecar works better with every new OS version, just as Stage manager has developed. But having said that, I wouldn't have a clue how that affects pre-subscription versions SketchUP.
Maybe its something you can email the SketchUP and hopefully get a proper answer from?

I don't use the sidecar but I can imagine that it's prob a good idea to also update the Mac to the latest version if you are going for that on the iPad.
 

Member2010

macrumors regular
Jun 28, 2013
144
7
Well, as long as Jobs were here you actually had to buy every major Mac OS X release if you wanted to update your computer, remember? Last one was 10.8 Mountain Lion for $19 in 2012, so it is an even more recent phenomenon to get major updates for free… 😛

Regarding iOS, what I can recall it has always been that Apple wants to push out the latest major version software to all units that are compatible, but also have had a good track record providing critical security updates to units stuck on older iOS-versions.

Problem is for those who voluntarily want to stick to older versions.

I'm actually fine with that if the alternative is cutting off support for older models arbitrarily early and making the development tools incapable of compiling for anything but the most recent 2-3 versions of OSX. It's just exhausting.

As for iOS, I don't care much about the "security" stuff. What irks me is that they don't readily provide newest-compatible-versions of software on the official outlet as a means to encourage people to replace devices unnecessarily.
 

FeliApple

macrumors 68040
Apr 8, 2015
3,684
2,088
Regarding iOS, what I can recall it has always been that Apple wants to push out the latest major version software to all units that are compatible, but also have had a good track record providing critical security updates to units stuck on older iOS-versions.

Problem is for those who voluntarily want to stick to older versions.
Yeah, this has always been the case, sadly. With iOS’ obliteration policy coupled with the inability to freely downgrade, it’s not a good solution.

Luckily, Apple allows those of us who value performance, stability, and battery life to stay behind without too much hassle.
 

bw44

macrumors member
Jun 24, 2012
82
19
My wife’s older IPad Pro was eligible for upgrading to iPadOS 17; the updates appeared under Settings.
No updates appeared for 16 after 16.7.2 until sometime in the last month or so. Now the ONLY update available is 16.7.5; 17.3.1 isn’t an option under Settings.

Why is it not showing an update to 17.3.1 being available? Will I be able to update it to 17.3.x if I update it to 16.7.5 first? (I know I could just try it, but would like to know what the possibilities are!)
 

darngooddesign

macrumors P6
Jul 4, 2007
18,362
10,114
Atlanta, GA
My wife’s older IPad Pro was eligible for upgrading to iPadOS 17; the updates appeared under Settings.
No updates appeared for 16 after 16.7.2 until sometime in the last month or so. Now the ONLY update available is 16.7.5; 17.3.1 isn’t an option under Settings.

Why is it not showing an update to 17.3.1 being available? Will I be able to update it to 17.3.x if I update it to 16.7.5 first? (I know I could just try it, but would like to know what the possibilities are!)
Yes, you will be able to update to the latest 17.3.x if you update it to 16.7.5 first.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.