Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Other Iphone 15 (non pro) to have 60 HZ or more?

MyPhone99

MyPhone99

macrumors regular
Original poster
May 26, 2019
237
146
Any rumors if iPhone 15 (non pro models) will have 60HZ or more. High time they should have get out from 60HZ . For a 900$ phone in 2023 60hz is not acceptable. Always on display/ less premium look/ extra lens are fine for non pro but they should increase at least to 90HZ
 
  • Like
Reactions: Matsamoto, dduraznito and sorgo †
MyPhone99 said:
Any rumors if iPhone 15 (non pro models) will have 60HZ or more. High time they should have get out from 60HZ . For a 900$ phone in 2023 60hz is not acceptable. Always on display/ less premium look/ extra lens are fine for non pro but they should increase at least to 90HZ
Click to expand...
Nope, not going to happen. The question is not about a $900 phone having 60Hz, the point Apple want you to know is for you to spend $1000 to get the proper flagship iPhone.
 
  • Angry
  • Like
Reactions: sorgo † and Splitrail
Pretty unlikely, they need to have enough features to upsell you to the Pro, and that one is still one of the big differentiators. Apple has as yet to bring Pro Motion to any non Pro device, but who knows, maybe they would eventually upgrade to 90Hz on the non Pros and give it a silly marketing name like Motion Plus, Liquid Motion or Super Retina Motion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: redbeard331
bodonnell202 said:
Pretty unlikely, they need to have enough features to upsell you to the Pro, and that one is still one of the big differentiators. Apple has as yet to bring Pro Motion to any non Pro device, but who knows, maybe they would eventually upgrade to 90Hz on the non Pros and give it a silly marketing name like Motion Plus, Liquid Motion or Super Retina Motion.
Click to expand...
LiquidMotion actually doesn’t sound too bad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheYayAreaLiving 🎗️
dumastudetto said:
Semi-Pro Motion could happen but consumers don't really want it so it's an unnecessary extra cost for Apple.
Click to expand...
lol. Semi-Pro is bad branding, as it already indicates that it's "less/worse" than the existing Pro.
I don't think consumers "don't really want it." If Apple did put high refresh rate on regular iPhone, consumers will just accept it. It's more of a cost and segmenting the product lines for Apple, and Apple has decided high refresh rate to be a "Pro" feature from way back when Pro-Motion was introduced on the iPad Pro.
 
ian87w said:
lol. Semi-Pro is bad branding, as it already indicates that it's "less/worse" than the existing Pro.
I don't think consumers "don't really want it." If Apple did put high refresh rate on regular iPhone, consumers will just accept it. It's more of a cost and segmenting the product lines for Apple, and Apple has decided high refresh rate to be a "Pro" feature from way back when Pro-Motion was introduced on the iPad Pro.
Click to expand...

I used Semi-Pro purposely to emphasise the pointlessness of 90hz. With Apple apparently working on an even higher price point iPhone Ultra, the Pros will need to retain much of what it already has in terms of segmentation from the regular budget iPhones.
 
It’s already getting the island, which is what most people care about. No chance of 120Hz.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MarkX
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back