Those came from an iPhone??
Not that im calling anyone a liar, but i'd like to see some Exif Data on those photos....
Not that im calling anyone a liar, but i'd like to see some Exif Data on those photos....
Actually, over saturated yes, over exposed ... not exactly. There's a difference between the two.I am confident that Apple intends for them to look that way.
Apple = new and hip
Over saturated+overexposed = new and hip
Ergo apples new hip iphone takes new hip blown out saturated pictures.
Do they look good? Debatable. Will people eat it up? Absolutely.
Ummm ask Apple then. Doubt you'll get it from here.Not that im calling anyone a liar, but i'd like to see some Exif Data on those photos....
So why don't you do so? It'a all there.
http://images.apple.com/iphone/features/includes/camera-gallery/02-20100607.jpg
Handling APPx (0xe0) block.
Handling APPx (0xec) block.
Handling APPx (0xee) block.
End of APPx data blocks reached.
Status = 0
Unable to extract some or all of the EXIF data, which may have been removed from the image file.
Yep the iPhone 4g, right from Apples site.
Why ask if you aren't going to believe the answer?
And Steve explicitly said that "these were taken from the iPhone 4, with nothing else done to them."
So why don't you do so? It'a all there.
Ummm ask Apple then. Doubt you'll get it from here.
I'm with Negrito on this one. I'm calling shens on those iPhone pics. Those pics look like they are from a DSLR with some lighting equipment.
Just like I'm calling shens on the quality of the picture they show on the FaceTime feature. I seriously doubt the picture is clear and vibrant as that on a .3mp camera.
Apple is good at presentation, I'll given them that.