I have been saying since the Keynote that the X is a massive disappointment.
Obviously not everyone agrees with me and people still went out and bought it anyway and are happy with it, and that's fine.
But the bottom line is, for a 10 year special edition iphone, the X failed to deliver on a device worthy of a 10 year anniversary Apple smartphone.
Okay you replaced TID with FID, but why make a biometric system the killer feature on the device when it simply replaced another biometric system. And then to charge ($1500 in Australia) for a device which offered nothing really new, is it any surprise that sales are down?
Link: https://www.extremetech.com/mobile/...e-falls-analysts-warn-iphone-x-sales-dropping
Accoring to the link, sales are down and Apple's share price has suffered as a result.
If, as a tech consumer product company, you keep offering very little in terms of innovation yet keep charging more, this is what happens. I don't need to have an MBA to know this, it's common sense and you think Tim Cook would know this too but apparently he doesn't. The only thing Tim Cook knows to do is drive the bus that Steve Jobs built.
Brand loyalty can only get you so far. And with the competition offering more and more innovation, things won't change unless Apple does an about face and gets serious about the iphone again.
If all people wanted was to keep the ecosystem in tact with a solid decvice for 2017, the iphone 8/ 8 Plus would have done the job sublimely. But a 10 year edition device had to be much more than what the X was.
It's not like Apple has not been in the wars before because of stupid decisions it made. Once upon a time Steve Jobs had to come back and rescue it, unfortunately he won't be around a second time if Tim Crook keeps slowing down the innovation and all the while increasing the price.
Obviously not everyone agrees with me and people still went out and bought it anyway and are happy with it, and that's fine.
But the bottom line is, for a 10 year special edition iphone, the X failed to deliver on a device worthy of a 10 year anniversary Apple smartphone.
Okay you replaced TID with FID, but why make a biometric system the killer feature on the device when it simply replaced another biometric system. And then to charge ($1500 in Australia) for a device which offered nothing really new, is it any surprise that sales are down?
Link: https://www.extremetech.com/mobile/...e-falls-analysts-warn-iphone-x-sales-dropping
Accoring to the link, sales are down and Apple's share price has suffered as a result.
If, as a tech consumer product company, you keep offering very little in terms of innovation yet keep charging more, this is what happens. I don't need to have an MBA to know this, it's common sense and you think Tim Cook would know this too but apparently he doesn't. The only thing Tim Cook knows to do is drive the bus that Steve Jobs built.
Brand loyalty can only get you so far. And with the competition offering more and more innovation, things won't change unless Apple does an about face and gets serious about the iphone again.
If all people wanted was to keep the ecosystem in tact with a solid decvice for 2017, the iphone 8/ 8 Plus would have done the job sublimely. But a 10 year edition device had to be much more than what the X was.
It's not like Apple has not been in the wars before because of stupid decisions it made. Once upon a time Steve Jobs had to come back and rescue it, unfortunately he won't be around a second time if Tim Crook keeps slowing down the innovation and all the while increasing the price.