Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

robotrenegade

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Apr 16, 2002
921
2
Greenville,SC
I was very surpise when I hook my camera up to my mac and downloaded the files to iPhoto. I found out that iphoto doesn't handle raw format. What gives with the big upgrade and not being able to handle raw files. I do have photoshop CS but still a pain. What about the ppl that don't have PS and want to have uncompressed pictures.
 
Re: iPhoto 4.0 crappy upgrade

Originally posted by robotrenegade
What about the ppl that don't have PS and want to have uncompressed pictures.

They buy photoshop. Isn't RAW format pretty unused in the pure consumer market, which is what iPhoto is aimed at?
 
Not really, I use it to keep my photos in order. Plus when you start to charge people for software it should have little more controls. It only a little more code, how hard is it.
 
Re: Re: iPhoto 4.0 crappy upgrade

Originally posted by Le Big Mac
They buy photoshop. Isn't RAW format pretty unused in the pure consumer market, which is what iPhoto is aimed at?
Exactly - every digicam I've ever bought comes with JPG as the default picture format.
 
Originally posted by iindigo
BTW, may I ask why on earth you would have to use RAW anyway?

RAW formats are the digital negative. There are real limits as to what you can do with a JPG to correct the image if needed. RAWW allows for greater flexibility.

While it would be great to "edit a RAW image in iPhoto; I just want to view the images for cataloging purposes.

I know that I could get iView Pro, but there are those of us that really like how iPhoto is growing up into a fine management program.
 
Up until Photoshop CS (8), the RAW camera plug-in was an additional $100. I see no need for it in a consumer app. If you want a high-end photo organization tool, look at iView Media Pro.
 
Originally posted by dwsolberg
Up until Photoshop CS (8), the RAW camera plug-in was an additional $100. I see no need for it in a consumer app. If you want a high-end photo organization tool, look at iView Media Pro.

But that is the thing. Not everyone needs IView Media Pro. For many of us iPhoto is just the right tool.
 
I'm surprised that people are expecting ("Crappy upgrade?") to get a feature that even Photoshop users had to pay $100 for up until the current version built in to a simple image organizer that costs $50 in a bundle with a movie editor, a DVD creation app, and a midi sound studio app. If iPhoto cost $50 alone, maybe, but it's really just a little piece of software for the Joe Consumer to get some pictures out of his camera, sort them, maybe adjust the color a tad and crop them, then print.

Not that RAW support wouldn't be nice for the few people who use it (which, if you took a survey of consumer-level digital camera users, I'll bet would be an EXTREMELY small number), but in addition to support for reading and manipulating the format, Apple would also have to add more image control than they currently have (and do it a bit differently than they way they do now) to make working with the format useful.

Maybe they will add it at some point, but I really doubt that it's a feature all but a tiny fraction of iPhoto users would use at this point. Heck, I don't think Quicktime even supports RAW right now.
 
Maybe you need to realize the purpose of iPhoto. It is not for the pro who wants to edit his images, but for the consumer who wants to put his images on the computer, maybe order some prints, take out some red-eye, and do some minor adjustments.

Don't ask too much.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.