Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

brn2ski00

macrumors 68020
Original poster
Aug 16, 2007
2,243
16
MA
Folks, never have seen this breakdown before, so I thought I'd share my calculations with you:

** iPod Pricing per Gigabyte (as of 2/19/08) **

1GB Shuffle - $49 / 1 = $49.00 per GB
2GB Shuffle - $69 / 2 = $34.50 per GB


4GB Nano - $149 / 4 = $37.25 per GB
8GB Nano - $199 / 8 = $24.88 per GB


80GB Classic - $249 / 80 = $3.11 per GB
160GB Classic - $349 / 160 = $2.18 per GB

8GB Touch - $299 / 8 = $37.38 per GB
16GB Touch - $399 / 16 = $24.94 per GB
32GB Touch - $499 / 32 = $15.59 per GB


I thought that these were very interesting results, especially with the price "drop" of the iPod Shuffle annouced today. Keep in mind that each iPod comes with its own advantages/disadvantages. I just wanted to point out the huge difference in pricing amongst them all.
 
Nothing shocking there. Pretty standard volume pricing model. Also, keep in mind the iPod Classics are HDD-based, while the Shuffles, Nanos, and Touches are flash-based, so the comparisons there are not valid.

Agreed, but I thought it was very interesting to see the breakdown amongst Apple's music players. Some people think strictly "bang for buck" and this pricing chart definitely aids this notion.
 
ipod classic 160GB?

looks like you might have a mistype there - the current 160GB models are $349. just a heads up!
 
What exactly is the point of this thread?

Good design has no value?
Ease of use has no value?
 
No real reason, thought it may be cool to see the price per GB and where we were getting screwed. It was really a spawn of the iPod shuffle price drop this morning.... those things should be virtually free. $29 max!
 
I wouldn't say we're "getting screwed", as you can't necessarily measure a thing's value on a simple measurement such as the cost/storage breakdown. If you're comparing a series of naked notebook hard drives that are all identical otherwise, then that makes sense, but here you're looking at a finalized product, where the storage cost is not the value measurement. Design, size, function, capability (not capacity), displays, etc., etc, all have to be factored in. These aren't boxes of corn flakes.
 
What exactly is the point of this thread?

Good design has no value?
Ease of use has no value?

Hmm. I think so too. I think the ipod classic has the best bang for the cash, i think the touch is the best ipod, the nano is OKAY, but very popular, and the shuffle is for the small target of people without a lot of songs. I have a classic, 80gb silver. I got it this weekend, and lOVE it, it has an amazing battery life!!!
 
Hmm. I think so too. I think the ipod classic has the best bang for the cash, i think the touch is the best ipod, the nano is OKAY, but very popular, and the shuffle is for the small target of people without a lot of songs. I have a classic, 80gb silver. I got it this weekend, and lOVE it, it has an amazing battery life!!!

Exactly =)

There is an iPod for different needs of different people. Storage alone is not the only thing that matters.
 
Maybe storage wise, but I have yet to see an iPod(stock and new) that meets my needs as a consumer.

Let me guess, you want something like 100TB of storage, in the size of nano, with 1 million hours of battery life, etc. for $0.99.



THATS EXACTLY what I've been saying to my friend, he keeps saying i should have gotten a touch like him, and i say that same thing too!!

Yeah, I have:
Full size iPod for AIFF quality music backup for DJing.
Nano for flying on airplanes (Nano fits easily in my shirt pocket).
iPhone for the internet addiction
MBP 17" as 17" iPod =p
 
That's a neat idea to investigate. A BIG however is the type of memory utilized. I imagine the Nano and Shuffle are in the same territory but the 1.8" in the Classic is like incorporating a WD 320GB for $130 into the mix.
 
Let me guess, you want something like 100TB of storage, in the size of nano, with 1 million hours of battery life, etc. for $0.99.

Nope. Something very simple. I want full UMS support, so I can use finder/explorer to add my music, instead of an intermediary software, and a built in voice recorder to record class lectures. Then again a better eq and sq would be nice, but that just being picky.
 
I have slippery hands. I've dropped my 2G nano about 20 times, still works. Dropped my old mini once....done, dropped my 5G 30gb twice...done. Damn moving parts :mad:. Flash based drives are the way to go.



Bill
 
What exactly are the pros of buying the iPod Nano? I ask this of owners because I personally don't see any. (I'm just curious, not flaming!)

For an extra $100 from the lowest-priced model, you jump up 74GB with the Classic. I know the Nano is smaller, but I can easily fit a 5G iPod in my pocket.

Opinions?
 
That's a neat idea to investigate. A BIG however is the type of memory utilized. I imagine the Nano and Shuffle are in the same territory but the 1.8" in the Classic is like incorporating a WD 320GB for $130 into the mix.

Thanks bud, because I wasn't sure if people would enjoy or see fit this chart.

Cheers!
 
i found it quite surprising that the touch has the same price/GB as the nano. considering the design differences. nice comparison, thanks.

also refects the huge price differences between ssd disk and 1.8'hd in the macbook air. i'm not going to calculate the price/gb there:D

surprising is also that the iphone is $50/GB considering that we pay monthly service fees on top of that;)
 
Nope. Something very simple. I want full UMS support, so I can use finder/explorer to add my music, instead of an intermediary software, and a built in voice recorder to record class lectures. Then again a better eq and sq would be nice, but that just being picky.

You can always flash the iPod firmware with a third party firmware that allows manual organization of music but then you really won't be getting the iPod experience.

People I know organize music by files / directories 8-10 years ago, after iTunes I find no need to manually organize music. It's better to have all your music in a central location anyway, instead of scattered around 5 different computer / drives. It's just a different way of doing things, once you learn it, it's much faster to do it through iTunes.

As to voice recorder, you can buy an external, however, it's probably better to actually take notes and listen during lectures than trying to record class lectures, and make a half effort to try to listen while you are doing something else.

Note that voice recorder is just a gimmick. Had one, never used it. In most places / states you are not suppose to record without permission. Most teachers won't let you record due to legal reasons.
 
I got a 32gb ipod mini with rockbox on it because I rather not deal with an intermediary software so, I pretty much got the ipod I want. Besides what experience am I getting with an ipod, that I can't get with my Cowon or with Sony? Better yet, I am missing out on things with my ipod imho. My music has always been organized for years so I never had that problem.

With a voice recorder never had an issue at all. None of my teacher complained nor did it cause a distraction for me. I turned the player on, set it on record and turned the screen off and left it recording while I was taking notes. Works better built in as it more convenient.
 
I got a 32gb ipod mini with rockbox on it because I rather not deal with an intermediary software so, I pretty much got the ipod I want. Besides what experience am I getting with an ipod, that I can't get with my Cowon or with Sony? Better yet, I am missing out on things with my ipod imho. My music has always been organized for years so I never had that problem.

With a voice recorder never had an issue at all. None of my teacher complained nor did it cause a distraction for me. I turned the player on, set it on record and turned the screen off and left it recording while I was taking notes. Works better built in as it more convenient.

32gb mini? since when...
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.