I know that 96 GB was supported in Lion. How about Mountain Lion ?
I remember reading somewhere that ML was tested to support 128gb, but only shows 96gb in about this mac and the like. In activity monitor, though, 128gb showed up and was accessible.
Others will chime in.
In my test it was almost the opposite. In about this Mac 128 GB shows up, but in activity monitor only 96 is reported. Then when I ran a program that I knew would try to use 128, it could not. I suppose activity monitor may not be reporting usage above 96 GB, but what else can you do?
I know that 96 GB was supported in Lion. How about Mountain Lion ?
Then why would OWC be selling 128 GB for the Mac Pro if the excess above 96 is not usable? http://eshop.macsales.com/shop/memory/Mac-Pro-Memory Give them a call.
Says right below: **Current Mac OS X versions are unable to utilize more then 96GB RAM due to an operating system limitation. 128GB can be fully utilized by a 2009-2010 Mac Pro if running Bootcamp with 64-bit versions of Windows XP and later as well as with 64-bit versions of Linux.
Thank you. I just wanted to know
Windows Vista Business/Ultimate supports up to 128 GB RAM
Windows 7 Professional/Ultimate supports up to 192 GB RAM
Windows 8 consumer preview supports up to 512 GB RAM![]()
That's interesting. I wonder why they just din't set the limit at 999 Exabytes or some other ridiculous amount and avoid issues? It's not like they are unaware that capabilities of hardware increase all the time.
The amount of RAM that the OS can support is irrelevant at this point. The concern is really what one's logic board can support.
send a @mail to tim cook to fix it !
He will probably answer we do not support such large amount of RAM and will tell us to wait till Mac Pro 2013 ;P