I was buying a Dual-Core 2.0 from an Apple Reseller but they can't add the 6600 (none LE) and bigger Hard Drive without sending it to Apple first (14 days or so).
I *could* take that option, get a 2.0 Dual-Core with a 250Gb HDD, 6600 and 2Gig of DDR2 and wait it out for two weeks. But there is another option, the budget breeching option - the 2.3. The 2.3 has the 250gb HDD and 6600 already so thats handy - I can get it next day more or less and could add 1Gb of DDR2 (not sure if the store was quoting me 1.5gb or 1.0gb but nevermind).
But im still thinking if its worth the premium for the 0.3Ghz? There isnt anything else is there thats different now between the 2.0 and 2.3 besides the clocks.... so i dont see the 0.3Ghz making much difference (definatley not enough to mean the difference between a program running fast and a program running 'slow'?). My plan is to wait till the 7800 GT's arrive then hopefully purchase one and have a neat gaming machine - thats a Mac. I use my system for loads of things, and gaming is one - and ive been down the 'top spec PC' instead road and i just cant face Windows and i don't have the space for more than one computer! I can just about manage the G5. Also i wouldnt really want to split my resources that way - it would be like having to upgrade two systems intstead of one - twice the cost - besides all that im just looking for a more 'all in one' solution.
Right well, benchmarks show that the 2.3 is as fast as the 2.5 DP yeah? So does that mean the 2.0 is near the speed of the original DP 2.3? I did see the benchmarks showing the 2.7Ghz ran UT2004 slower than the new 2.3 which was impressive (not much, few FPS or so). Im just thinking how much that extra MHz will mean (and the 0.15ghz FSB) for some possible upcoming titles on the Mac like 'Quake 4' or Black & White 2.
Maybe it would have been better for Apple to make a Single Dual-Core 2.5ghz XD
I *could* take that option, get a 2.0 Dual-Core with a 250Gb HDD, 6600 and 2Gig of DDR2 and wait it out for two weeks. But there is another option, the budget breeching option - the 2.3. The 2.3 has the 250gb HDD and 6600 already so thats handy - I can get it next day more or less and could add 1Gb of DDR2 (not sure if the store was quoting me 1.5gb or 1.0gb but nevermind).
But im still thinking if its worth the premium for the 0.3Ghz? There isnt anything else is there thats different now between the 2.0 and 2.3 besides the clocks.... so i dont see the 0.3Ghz making much difference (definatley not enough to mean the difference between a program running fast and a program running 'slow'?). My plan is to wait till the 7800 GT's arrive then hopefully purchase one and have a neat gaming machine - thats a Mac. I use my system for loads of things, and gaming is one - and ive been down the 'top spec PC' instead road and i just cant face Windows and i don't have the space for more than one computer! I can just about manage the G5. Also i wouldnt really want to split my resources that way - it would be like having to upgrade two systems intstead of one - twice the cost - besides all that im just looking for a more 'all in one' solution.
Right well, benchmarks show that the 2.3 is as fast as the 2.5 DP yeah? So does that mean the 2.0 is near the speed of the original DP 2.3? I did see the benchmarks showing the 2.7Ghz ran UT2004 slower than the new 2.3 which was impressive (not much, few FPS or so). Im just thinking how much that extra MHz will mean (and the 0.15ghz FSB) for some possible upcoming titles on the Mac like 'Quake 4' or Black & White 2.
Maybe it would have been better for Apple to make a Single Dual-Core 2.5ghz XD