Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Avzone

macrumors regular
Original poster
Mar 13, 2004
179
0
U.k
Just wondered what the difference was as I have a copy of Virtual Pc 6 and cant yet have bootcamp til I upgrade everything.
Thanks!
:)
 

Tallest Skil

macrumors P6
Aug 13, 2006
16,044
4
1 Geostationary Tower Plaza
Oh, goodness me, very much so.

VirtualPC was absolutely terrible at what it did, even for a virtualization suite.

Because the OS is being virtualized, it cannot access the full potential of the hardware and would thus run very slowly. Boot Camp, on the other hand, runs Windows natively, giving it the same access to the hardware as OS X.

Current virtualization software, such as Parallels and VMware, do their jobs MUCH better than Virtual PC ever did, because they don't have to emulate an x86/x64 processor, among other reasons. In fact, for most purposes (other than games and other things graphically intense), either of these virtualization softwares would be perfectly suited to running Windows full time.
 

Avzone

macrumors regular
Original poster
Mar 13, 2004
179
0
U.k
>>>

Yeah thought so... That make sense, have to start my upgrade.
Thanks!
;)
 

dkeninitz

macrumors regular
Feb 16, 2003
182
0
Germantown, MD
They're different things altogether. Boot camp simply lets you boot one operating system or the other (OS X or Windows). VirtualPC was a hackneyed attempt to create a Windows virtual machine running within Mac OS X.

BTW, what are you "upgrading" from? Odds are that you haven't been running VirtualPC on a modern Intel-based Mac, but you have to have an Intel-based Mac to run Windows via Bootcamp.
 

Avzone

macrumors regular
Original poster
Mar 13, 2004
179
0
U.k
>>>

Yeah I got a Power Pc Powerbook g4 and it seem I lose out on a lot of stuff as I haven't got an Intel Processor.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.