I totally agree. iPad will always exist in some form. My question is, What is the true identity of the iPad Pro? Does the world need a $2000 tablet that advertises itself as a pro device which can not really do what a MacBook does. When it will start doing what a MacBook does, will it still be an iPad? If you must buy a keyboard and mouse and connect it to an external monitor, why not just buy a Mac mini? If you are a developer, do you really want to buy a $300 app that you must drag around a screen with your finger and can not really see all the many sliders and adjustment controls like like you can on a Mac? Do you need to pay over $2000 to watch movies and read emails if that is your primary reason for buying a tablet? iPad Pro is not really pro and it is becoming more than just a consumption device. Where does it stop? I can not really see a place for a tablet that is a MacBook or is it a MacBook that is a tablet?
Because the simple fact remains, as much as everyone tries to tell everyone what a MacBook can do that an iPad cant, the reverse is also true.
All the stuff macs can do over an iPad is geeky, traditional computing stuff.
Not newfangled cool AR, swipe touch hold, scan a room, write a note, sketch a pic, scan some stuff, take a picture or a video, edit and share, whack it in your backpack, use it on the flight deck or in the OR.
Or get a mac and use terminal or virtualise different os’ or use powerful maths programmes, or render huge Hollywood movies great. But the iPad is full of new and fresh ideas. F*** what a mac can do. You know what I mean?