Seriously
For what I need it for, to save a couple hundred bucks, is it OK to purchase the 20" with it's noted LCD deficiencies, less overall screen area, etc?
I am buying the stripped down, bare bones 2.4g with 1g RAM, 250HDD, only to pop the drive, put in a 1TB and another stick of RAM for 2g total. I run a mobile sound company, have for 20 years. Last year, I digitized the music to hard drive and with a total of over 125,000 songs, we need big hard drives! The problem, all summer, this summer...we have been using MacBook Pros with external drives. We always have two (1tb) drives hooked up for redundancy sake via F/W.
Hence, the iMac experiment. Obviously, cost-wise, there is no comparison. The iMac wins hands down, even if I went with the 3.06data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Smile :) :)"
We are also thinking about space consideration and consolidation (footprint) without the mess of wires, the incredibly flexible firewire cords we all know and love...as well as HDD power cords.
Also, security. With a collective of music this extensive, we don't want to lose it, have it stolen, or have it duplicated. It is, in fact, one of the big expenses...both financially and time wise, for one of these businesses. Without the music being on externals, it can be locked by admin priveleges, I am assuming, so it cannot be duplicated. This is obviously in the case of employees, not that I don't scrutinize during my hiring process, but ya never know.
Anyway, that all said, is it OK to buy a 20"? Also, for storage, I can get a bit smaller Pelican case with the 20, saving another C note or sodata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Smile :) :)"
Jer
For what I need it for, to save a couple hundred bucks, is it OK to purchase the 20" with it's noted LCD deficiencies, less overall screen area, etc?
I am buying the stripped down, bare bones 2.4g with 1g RAM, 250HDD, only to pop the drive, put in a 1TB and another stick of RAM for 2g total. I run a mobile sound company, have for 20 years. Last year, I digitized the music to hard drive and with a total of over 125,000 songs, we need big hard drives! The problem, all summer, this summer...we have been using MacBook Pros with external drives. We always have two (1tb) drives hooked up for redundancy sake via F/W.
Hence, the iMac experiment. Obviously, cost-wise, there is no comparison. The iMac wins hands down, even if I went with the 3.06
We are also thinking about space consideration and consolidation (footprint) without the mess of wires, the incredibly flexible firewire cords we all know and love...as well as HDD power cords.
Also, security. With a collective of music this extensive, we don't want to lose it, have it stolen, or have it duplicated. It is, in fact, one of the big expenses...both financially and time wise, for one of these businesses. Without the music being on externals, it can be locked by admin priveleges, I am assuming, so it cannot be duplicated. This is obviously in the case of employees, not that I don't scrutinize during my hiring process, but ya never know.
Anyway, that all said, is it OK to buy a 20"? Also, for storage, I can get a bit smaller Pelican case with the 20, saving another C note or so
Jer