Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

davekarn

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Jul 27, 2007
358
33
Just curious if there is something similar to this in Tiger or if anyone has done the performance rating on their iMac while booting through Vista. I'm curious as to what kind of rating it would receive. Thanks for any info!
 

davekarn

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Jul 27, 2007
358
33
So I have a lot of views... yet no replies. Can anyone answer please? Thanks!:)
 

davekarn

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Jul 27, 2007
358
33
Apple has no need for performance ratings because there are like only 3 models...

Good point... I'm dumb :(

Edit: But I was thinking in terms of Vista how the Macs stack up on their scale. For instance my Dell is a 3.1 and therefore sucks ass for the most part. Just curious what kind of rating an iMac would get using the same scale.
 

apfhex

macrumors 68030
Aug 8, 2006
2,670
5
Northern California
Just curious if there is something similar to this in Tiger or if anyone has done the performance rating on their iMac while booting through Vista.
No, because it's silly. :p But you sure could install Vista and try it out if you really wanted to know.

my Dell is a 3.1 and therefore sucks ass
Doesn't mean a whole lot. Whatever part gets the lowest rating determines that number, so for example if you have an awesome PC but the graphics card is basic (because you don't game or need it for anything else), the final rating will only be as high as the rating for the graphics card.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.