Looking for a 27-32inch monitor with color & HDR that's as good as MBP Liquid Retina XDR display. I've tried a few and nothing so far compares! Any "HDR10" monitor is out. I've tried Asus ProArt PA32UCR which is supposed to be 1000 nits and 98% P3 but when I test 12-bit color images or iOS video there are lots of bright spots where the ProArt monitor blows out and yet all looks fine on the Liquid Retina XDR. I haven't tried testing the Studio display because I read it's basically the same as the iMac Retina 5k and I have that-- it's a great screen but HDR isn't nearly as good as the Liquid Retina XDR. So what's the deal? Does Apple just use unobtanium for the MBP displays?
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Is there any monitor with color / HDR as good as MBP Liquid Retina XDR?
- Thread starter aurieg92
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
A real pro photographic monitor (Eizo is one major brand) will be quite significantly better than any Apple display with the possible exception of the Pro Display XDR.
Even the XDR is difficult to calibrate (it was uncalibratable for a long time, then Apple allowed calibration, but only using a very expensive (many thousand $, often over $10,000) tool called a spectroradiometer. Hollywood production houses have spectroradiometers lying around, but they are beyond the reach of ordinary photographers and small video shops.
Ordinary colorimeters (available for $100 to $400, depending on quality and software) don't work, although there are some workarounds. Pro photographic monitors are explicitly DESIGNED to work with a colorimeter, and some expensive models actually have colorimeters built in.
The accuracy and gamut of a good photographic monitor is significantly beyond a Mac screen, but you won't get the resolution. Some of them are sub-4K, probably the largest group are standard 4K (3840x2160 pixels) and a few are Cinema 4K (4096x2160). I'm not aware of any that are higher resolution than that, and I'm not aware of any of the monitor manufacturers being very interested in the short term. We'll see 8K versions at some point...
Even the XDR is difficult to calibrate (it was uncalibratable for a long time, then Apple allowed calibration, but only using a very expensive (many thousand $, often over $10,000) tool called a spectroradiometer. Hollywood production houses have spectroradiometers lying around, but they are beyond the reach of ordinary photographers and small video shops.
Ordinary colorimeters (available for $100 to $400, depending on quality and software) don't work, although there are some workarounds. Pro photographic monitors are explicitly DESIGNED to work with a colorimeter, and some expensive models actually have colorimeters built in.
The accuracy and gamut of a good photographic monitor is significantly beyond a Mac screen, but you won't get the resolution. Some of them are sub-4K, probably the largest group are standard 4K (3840x2160 pixels) and a few are Cinema 4K (4096x2160). I'm not aware of any that are higher resolution than that, and I'm not aware of any of the monitor manufacturers being very interested in the short term. We'll see 8K versions at some point...