http://sfbay.craigslist.org/sfc/pho/1755637130.html
New in box D90 for $650
Hes in San Fran wants to meet at a starbucks in a safeway at 7
New in box D90 for $650
Hes in San Fran wants to meet at a starbucks in a safeway at 7
http://sfbay.craigslist.org/sfc/pho/1755637130.html
Stolen? Rob you once you get there.
Who knows. Public place is good. Price seems too good to be true.
Good luck.
New in box D90 for $650
Hes in San Fran wants to meet at a starbucks in a safeway at 7
Someone wants to meet in a Safeway to sell you a brand new Nikon D90 at half price? Come on. You already know the answer to your question.http://sfbay.craigslist.org/sfc/pho/1755637130.html
New in box D90 for $650
Hes in San Fran wants to meet at a starbucks in a safeway at 7
http://sfbay.craigslist.org/sfc/pho/1755637130.html
New in box D90 for $650
Hes in San Fran wants to meet at a starbucks in a safeway at 7
shame you cannot get a conceal weapons permit, would be ideal for this kind of meeting, glad I moved to washington.
shame you cannot get a conceal weapons permit, would be ideal for this kind of meeting, glad I moved to washington.
That is just it. The camera is most likely stolen. There is also the possibility that this is a law enforcement sting operation. The fact is that the OP knows or should know that you cannot acquire a new Nikon D90 for $600 off list price. The person who claims to be trying to sell it knows that he can return the camera for a nominal restocking fee. This fee is certainly less than $100. Yet the seller is willing to take a $500 loss? Not jolly likely. If the OP had a lick of sense, then he would stay as far away from that Safeway as possible.Even if the product is legit, you might also be dealing with stolen merchandise. Just a thought.
There is also the possibility that this is a law enforcement sting operation. The fact is that the OP knows or should know that you cannot acquire a new Nikon D90 for $600 off list price. The person who claims to be trying to sell it knows that he can return the camera for a nominal restocking fee. This fee is certainly less than $100. Yet the seller is willing to take a $500 loss? Not jolly likely. If the OP had a lick of sense, then he would stay as far away from that Safeway as possible.
ive already emailed him and done a background check on the name
his house is near the starbucks that he suggested and he is a white 24 year old that works as a camera operator for an exploritorium webcast
Even at that, the "seller" is letting it go at a $100 loss in the most optimistic scenario. You forget that he is supposed to be in business. You don't stay in business very long if you lose $100 per transaction.The d90 is an $800 camera, not a $1200 one. ...
Even at that, the "seller" is letting it go at a $100 loss in the most optimistic scenario. You forget that he is supposed to be in business. You don't stay in business very long if you lose $100 per transaction.
You are making a huge assumption and extrapolating some far-reaching conclusions based on your assumption. As for the "seller's" story, it has more holes than a colander."New in box" is still "Used" in the eyes of any business that buys equipment from random locals, not to mention those that do it by mail. ....
You are making a huge assumption and extrapolating some far-reaching conclusions based on your assumption. As for the "seller's" story, it has more holes than a colander.
Sarcasm is not your strong suit. FWIW, I could care less about the physical danger of going to a San Francisco Starbucks inside a San Francisco Safeway supermarket. The OP's story makes no sense. These are the things that we are supposed to believe:No, you're right; ...
Sarcasm is not your strong suit. [...]
This scenario is does not pass the Laugh Test. Neither does it pass the Smell Test. The most likely explanation is that the camera is stolen. It is also possible that this is a straight-up scam.